Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.2~bpo60+1
Severity: normal
lintian complains about a bad distribution when a codename (like, say,
wheezy or squeeze) is used in changes files as Distribution.
Cheers,
Julien
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy:
Hi
See attached document; comments welcome :)
~Niels
Topics:
- Vendor profiles
- Configuration file changes
- Changes to Lintian options
- Other improvements
- Known bugs and issues
- Help us help you
Vendor Profiles
===
Starting with version 2.5.2, Lintian can now be
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
* processes related packages together
Since 2.5.0~rc3 Lintian has grouped related packages and processed
them together. With this Lintian can now do things like check if a
manpage is in a direct dependency.
...in a direct dependency
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
lintian complains about a bad distribution when a codename (like, say,
wheezy or squeeze) is used in changes files as Distribution.
This was intentional, since my understanding was that stable,
stable-security, or stable-proposed-updates was supposed
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:54:17 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
lintian complains about a bad distribution when a codename (like, say,
wheezy or squeeze) is used in changes files as Distribution.
This was intentional, since my understanding was
On Aug 12, 2011, at 18:03, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
This otherwise looks great to me.
And on a personal note, thank you *so* much for all the work that you've
been doing on Lintian. I've often had the experience with other open
source projects of
Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com writes:
I've got a question regarding the various lintian modules. I'm a command
line person and often use tools like perldoc to read the documentation
that is in with code. Lintian does seem to use plain old documentation
very much which I think is
On Aug 12, 2011, at 21:36, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I've got a question regarding the various lintian modules. I'm a command line
person and often use tools like perldoc to read the documentation that is in
with code. Lintian does seem to use
I meant doesn't of course. :}
plain old
Here is an example of how I think pod might work;
---
README.developers |6 -
frontend/lintian | 60 ++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.developers b/README.developers
index dc1edd0..ca4b206 100644
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
checks/conffiles and checks/etcfiles are both very short and there's
certain amount of code duplication between them. I propose to merge them
in to a single check.
--
Jakub Wilk
diff --git a/checks/conffiles b/checks/conffiles
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.2
Tags: patch
In a few places, lintian sets the LANG variable to force a particular
locale. This is incorrect, as LANG determines the locale only in the
absence of the LC_ALL and other LC_* (LC_COLLATE, LC_CTYPE, LC_MESSAGES,
LC_MONETARY, LC_NUMERIC, LC_TIME)
* Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net, 2011-07-18, 00:34:
I attached a (preliminary?) patch adding support for very basic DEP-5
validation. Beware, tag descriptions could use some love. ;)
Hi
Thanks for looking into this.
Personally I am considering if this should be moved into its own check.
12 matches
Mail list logo
