Bug#702347: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml

Package: lintian lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml [0],[1],[2] [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2012/05/msg00091.html [1] http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org.html [2]

Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml

Package: lintian lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml [0],[1],[2] [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2012/05/msg00091.html [1] http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org.html [2]

Processed: merging 702347 702349

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: merge 702347 702349 Bug #702347 [lintian] lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml Bug #702349 [lintian] lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml Merged 702347 702349

Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml

On 2013-03-05 16:25, Prach Pongpanich wrote: Package: lintian lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml [0],[1],[2] [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2012/05/msg00091.html [1]

Processed: unmerge 702347

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unmerge 702347 Bug #702347 [lintian] lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml Bug #702349 [lintian] lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml Disconnected #702347 from all

Bug#702347: marked as done (lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Mar 2013 22:42:29 +0700 with message-id CAF=n8mkrnrdzqsys-9ddsjf1kjlhna56vtvlpt5ytauuwo8...@mail.gmail.com and subject line submits twice has caused the Debian Bug report #702347, regarding lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml to

Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml

Le 05/03/2013 16:35, Niels Thykier a écrit : Does ELF binaries produced by pure Ocaml have any distinct feature that can be used to tell them apart from any other ELF binary? ELF binaries produced by the OCaml compiler always include a bit of C code (the runtime), so they are never actually

Bug#701477: lintian: Should it support XDG?

* Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net, 2013-03-03, 16:32: Supporting XDG_CONFIG_{HOME,DIRS} can be done fairly easily, see attached patch (which is bluntly assuming we are dropping LINTIAN_ROOT/lintianrc). Looks good to me. (Although I wonder why loading File::BaseDir is guarded by eval.