Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2014 08:26:40 +0200
with message-id
ca+7wusxp9mzkgw67j9wk7f7_e73hoiswwkvowcyzgn8gona...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#745827: Pre-Depend - Pre-Depends (with an 's')
has caused the Debian Bug report #745827,
regarding Pre-Depend - Pre-Depends (with an 's')
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: important
Hi,
Philipp Kern noticed that lintian was really slow to process
clhep-doc.
I had a look at profiling it and, unsurprisingly, we are dealing with a
case similar to the cruft/license checks. Profile was done with:
perl -d:NYTProf
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit d07f0cfac674e1b226a702f50bc001958846c42a
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Sat Apr 26 11:54:53 2014 +0200
c/cruft.pm: Use a char-class
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from 957aeaa c/java: Skip the codeless-jar tag on some jar files
new d07f0cf c/cruft.pm: Use a char-class rather than union in regex
The 1
Processing control commands:
clone -1 -2
Bug #745546 [lintian] lintian: False positive: openttd source:
source-is-missing os/dos/cwsdpmi/cwsdpmi.txt
Bug 745546 cloned as bug 745882
reassign -2 file
Bug #745882 [lintian] lintian: False positive: openttd source:
source-is-missing
control: clone -1 -2
control: reassign -2 file
control: block -1 by -2
control: retitle -2 File misidentify flash files [break lintian]
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org wrote:
On 22-04-14 20:47, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:17 +0200, Matthijs
Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2014 12:41:57 +0200
with message-id
cae2spabwdw0ixnpyqqxyhbwkj88oaccbcgia_gg4+qwmrc9...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#745763: lintian: False positive with RFCs
has caused the Debian Bug report #745763,
regarding lintian: False positive with RFCs
to be
Added, notes that you should ask to remove previous version of fpc
from datas.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org wrote:
Package: lintian
Context:
cae2spab6s3wxkx+9enfheoci2bfq4o4+h__vkup6c2a93lw...@mail.gmail.com
On 21-04-14 21:51, roucaries bastien
On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 12:49 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Added, notes that you should ask to remove previous version of fpc
from datas.debian.org
ITYM snapshot.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 26-04-14 12:49, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Added, notes that you should ask to remove previous version of fpc
from datas.debian.org
Sure, but I will do that after the current version of fpc has cleared
the NEW queue.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
broucaries-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit 352135e42fa25a8bd1cc51538b6f2d76d7ea8d7b
Author: Bastien ROUCARIÈS roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Apr 26 19:25:57 2014 +0200
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
broucaries-guest pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from d07f0cf c/cruft.pm: Use a char-class rather than union in regex
new 352135e data/cruft/non-distributable-files:
The 1 revisions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#lintian (2.5.23) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
#
# * data/cruft/non-distributable-files:
#+ [BR] Add a file comes from the Novell libc Software Development
# Kit. (Closes: #745802)
#
limit source lintian
Limiting to bugs with field
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from 352135e data/cruft/non-distributable-files:
new 60dcea8 Avoid /i in hot regexes for privacy-breach
The 1 revisions listed above as new are
reopen 745763
thanks
On Saturday 26 April 2014 12:41:57 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
[snip]
No the license is false, lintian is right.
The implementation of the US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1) in this
example is derived from the original description under license.
Legally you are bind to this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 745763
Bug #745763 {Done: Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com} [lintian]
lintian: False positive with RFCs
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #745763 to the same values
previously set
thanks
Stopping
control: tags -1 + wontfix
control: severity -1 minor
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezme...@gmail.com wrote:
reopen 745763
thanks
On Saturday 26 April 2014 12:41:57 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
[snip]
No the license is false, lintian is right.
The
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #745763 [lintian] lintian: False positive with RFCs
Added tag(s) wontfix.
severity -1 minor
Bug #745763 [lintian] lintian: False positive with RFCs
Severity set to 'minor' from 'important'
--
745763:
On Sunday 27 April 2014 02:13:04 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
control: tags -1 + wontfix
control: severity -1 minor
Now I do agree with this.
[snip]
Sorry, I think Lintian should warn about the code, not about a file that
is
only listing licenses.
Yes it is the case and I wish to keep
19 matches
Mail list logo
