Bug#832099: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Fri 2016-07-22 17:31:15 -0400, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I do think we should support reproducible builds for all packages, and >> that our default build should be reproducible. I'm just not sure that >> we should rule out allowing packages

Bug#832099: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

On Fri 2016-07-22 17:31:15 -0400, Russ Allbery wrote: > I do think we should support reproducible builds for all packages, and > that our default build should be reproducible. I'm just not sure that we > should rule out allowing packages to be configured to use default upstream > behavior for

Pq2

BfAszqfedbgb Sent from my iPhone

Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:14:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think that's fine in this case, since not setting that variable >> doesn't break the build. It just means the build isn't reproducible, >> which is an optional feature. > 1/ it's an

Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:55:46AM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Attached is the following: >> >> commit 3b10f7dbaecedb0a458c25cc0b8615b489d424af >> Author: Chris Lamb >> Date: Fri Jul 22 10:54:02 2016 +0100 >> >>

[lintian] 02/02: checks/files: Fix typo

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. jwilk pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 299324e6dae1eb0e8d6f39ba3c617e021dc79352 Author: Jakub Wilk Date: Fri Jul 22 15:57:32 2016 +0200 checks/files: Fix typo ---

[lintian] 01/02: spelling: Add more corrections

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. jwilk pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 3d30b6dcb76187dfac9a35afb17ccbe281923f08 Author: Jakub Wilk Date: Fri Jul 22 15:52:17 2016 +0200 spelling: Add more corrections ---

Bug#832096: lintian: please check for common typos in debian/rules target names

Jakub Wilk wrote: > Lintian is already aware of existing dh_* commands (see > data/debhelper/dh_commands), so maybe we could use this list instead of > manually maintaining possible misspellings? Not without changing this data structure as we want multiple misspellings to map to the correct

Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:55:46AM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote: > Attached is the following: > > commit 3b10f7dbaecedb0a458c25cc0b8615b489d424af > Author: Chris Lamb > Date: Fri Jul 22 10:54:02 2016 +0100 > > c/rules: Check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Bug#832099: lintian: please check for unnecessary SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH assignments

Source: lintian Version: 2.5.45 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Attached is the following: commit 3b10f7dbaecedb0a458c25cc0b8615b489d424af Author: Chris Lamb Date: Fri Jul 22 10:54:02 2016 +0100

Bug#832096: lintian: please check for common typos in debian/rules target names

Source: lintian Version: 2.5.45 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the following: commit 22f75ee230c6ae93e9192a663225626e73cf14c7 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Fri Jul 22 10:36:54 2016 +0100 c/rules: Check for common typos in debian/rules target names.