Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >>> Hi Julian, >>> >>> > I wonder whether the patch should check for

Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Hi Julian, >> >> > I wonder whether the patch should check for css_browser_selector (the >> > function name) rather than 'css browser selector' (the title)? >>

Confira a programação completa da Interconf 2017!

Interconf e Goiás Genética! De 16 a 23 de Setembro no Parque de Exposições Pedro Ludovico Teixeira.

Bug#760021: lintian: check for not wrap-and-sort formatted files

* Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:04:45AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Mattia convinced me, alas. Yes, not even at the "P:" level. Perhaps I'm > > stuck on thinking about the implementation... > > Lintian recently already "regressed" in its "policy" of not

Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Julian, > > > I wonder whether the patch should check for css_browser_selector (the > > function name) rather than 'css browser selector' (the title)? > > Great idea. I didn't actually spot this in the $block variable. Updated >

Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

Hi Julian, > I wonder whether the patch should check for css_browser_selector (the > function name) rather than 'css browser selector' (the title)? Great idea. I didn't actually spot this in the $block variable. Updated in:

[lintian] 01/01: Check for the css_browser_selector function call, not some descriptive text. Thanks to Julian Gilbey for the suggestion. (Refs: #874381)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 8a3ec2888011b93e5f55c31bcf366bff5a8f Author: Chris Lamb Date: Wed Sep 6 22:10:47 2017 +0100 Check for the css_browser_selector

[lintian] branch master updated (72d95b8 -> 8a3ec28)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 72d95b8 Avoid false positives in missing source checks for "CSS Browser Selector". (Closes: #874381) new 8a3ec28 Check for the

Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:33:58PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 874381 + pending > thanks > > Fixed in Git: > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=72d95b8ee796cafcdc05d4c612d1b435b9c37302 I wonder whether the patch should check for css_browser_selector (the

Re: [lintian] Membership audit and clean up - please follow up if you are still active

On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 10:13 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have gone through the member list on and removed members that were > inactive according to Debian's MIA database. > > Kindly review and act on the following: > >  * If you consider yourself retired from lintian, please let me know > and

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #131

See

Bug#873612: lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date for sources as well

Hi, > lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date >for sources as well Updated & rebased patch attached: commit 7ab09171ee4335556f78e2b4359d64d30a1b3ea2 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Wed Sep 6 08:25:49 2017 +0100 Move