On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:32:55AM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 820770 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Ron and Felipe,
>
> Hm, are #820770 and #889640 the same issue? If so, we should either
> close them both or reopen both of them.
Yes, that was exactly my line of thinking when I first saw thi
don't forget, the tag could also be marked as experimental, which is
thought exactly to help out developing of the tags with high chances of
fpos.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:48 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2018-02-05 04:38:14 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > tags 889592 + pending
> > thanks
On Mon 2018-02-05 04:38:14 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 889592 + pending
> thanks
>
> "Fixed" in Git, pending upload:
>
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=293c897ef968e0f50ac4f48986034aeda57e179d
>
> Ah well, just too many false-positive cases.. I mean, we'd hav
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 679124 + pending
Bug #679124 [lintian] lintian: error on d/rules having dh_make templates
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
679124: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
tags 679124 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=d0fec9183b5977fa8f5e0a779631bb140ee3415d
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit d0fec9183b5977fa8f5e0a779631bb140ee3415d
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Feb 5 22:41:52 2018 +
Check for debian/rules files that are dh_make templates.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from bc472ef c/r-lintian-harness: Clear the error-counter on a success
new d0fec91 Check for debian/rules files that are dh_make templates.
(Closes:
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2018 03:46:38 +0530
with message-id
<1517868998.2361167.1260559664.21557...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: [checks/fields] allow Vcs-* fields to be multiline
has caused the Debian Bug report #526713,
regarding [checks/fields] allow Vcs-* fields to
tags 820770 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Ron and Felipe,
Hm, are #820770 and #889640 the same issue? If so, we should either
close them both or reopen both of them.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 820770 + moreinfo
Bug #820770 [lintian] lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should
special-case runlevel S scripts
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
820770: http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 889102 + pending
Bug #889102 [lintian] [lintian] Please detect source missing .wasm file
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
889102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
tags 889102 + pending
thanks
This was fixed by Bastien in:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=740e6738e364f18662264d5cdd14552bc869a54b
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2018 02:18:21 +0530
with message-id
<1517863701.2323293.1260456416.6148f...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#889640: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop
misfire on rcS scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #889640,
regarding lintian:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:48:57PM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 889640 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> > # Default-Start: S
> > # Default-Stop: 0 6
> >
> > Will cause lintian to complain about it not being stopped in runlevel 1,
> > with a rationale that would be fine for servi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:06:35PM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> forcemerge 869547 889639
> thanks
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> This appears to be same issue as #869547 ("udev-rule-missing-subsystem
> false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO").
Ah, indeed. Sorry about the duplicate, this is the same and that
Le lundi, 5 février 2018, 16.58:46 h CET Chris Lamb a écrit :
> Fixed in Git, pending upload
Yay, thanks; and sorry for my unresponsiveness.
--
OdyX
Hi Didier,
> > Fixed in Git, pending upload
>
> Yay, thanks; and sorry for my unresponsiveness.
No problem; it was quite an "expansive" question :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from ba4969e c/r-lintian-harness: Add missing assignment
new bc472ef c/r-lintian-harness: Clear the error-counter on a success
The 1 revisions li
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from a25f871 checks/udev.pm: Add simple GOTO parsing to avoid false
positives when checking for udev rules for SUBSYSTEM specifiers. (Closes:
#869547, #88
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit bc472ef8b4ea4e00d3b02902a24b46a5ea102197
Author: Niels Thykier
Date: Mon Feb 5 17:57:38 2018 +
c/r-lintian-harness: Clear the error-counter on a s
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
nthykier pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit ba4969e690ac2ad11cb2109ca9818064a6569223
Author: Niels Thykier
Date: Mon Feb 5 17:56:27 2018 +
c/r-lintian-harness: Add missing assignment
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > In my case, I remember having touched many packages with dedicated
> > users created and I expect this tag to have a very high false positive
> > ratio
>
> Can you make this more concrete? (Or, perhaps, why is colord
> vulnerable but your particular
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 869547 + pending
Bug #869547 [lintian] udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules
file uses a GOTO
Bug #889639 [lintian] lintian: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false positive
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 889639
tags 869547 + pending
tags 889639 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=a25f87117ebe4deb3ec6ccee3d5d5c81e7aeba1d
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit a25f87117ebe4deb3ec6ccee3d5d5c81e7aeba1d
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Feb 5 15:57:46 2018 +
checks/udev.pm: Add simple GOTO parsing to avoid false po
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from 2901619 Only warn about bad-jar-name for "public" .jar files.
(Closes: #889628)
new a25f871 checks/udev.pm: Add simple GOTO parsing to avoid fa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 869547 889639
Bug #869547 [lintian] udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules
file uses a GOTO
Bug #869547 [lintian] udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules
file uses a GOTO
Marked as found in versions lintia
forcemerge 869547 889639
thanks
Hi Ron,
This appears to be same issue as #869547 ("udev-rule-missing-subsystem
false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO").
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
tags 889640 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Ron,
> # Default-Start: S
> # Default-Stop: 0 6
>
> Will cause lintian to complain about it not being stopped in runlevel 1,
> with a rationale that would be fine for services started in 2-5, but that
> doesn't really apply for things which can be shut
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 04:06:04PM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> > Right, but this way the whole tag has been downgraded.
>
> Mmm, as Lintian does not support "per-warning" severity levels. Is
> it worth having a separate, tags for the E and the W cases..?
I wondered about that too w
Hi Mattia,
> Right, but this way the whole tag has been downgraded.
Mmm, as Lintian does not support "per-warning" severity levels. Is
it worth having a separate, tags for the E and the W cases..?
If this was the difference between E/W and P, I would be easily
convinced but there is not too many
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:29:43PM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Fixed in Git, pending upload:
>
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=eadf7fd69fa0594407cacd34cbdfe1851bf6ec7b
Right, but this way the whole tag has been downgraded.
build-depends-on-obsolete-package also
tags 889628 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=29016192066d756160444a78b9a441865a4d39bd
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 889628 + pending
Bug #889628 [lintian] lintian: False-positive bad-jar-name
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
889628: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8896
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit 29016192066d756160444a78b9a441865a4d39bd
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Feb 5 10:19:56 2018 +
Only warn about bad-jar-name for "public" .jar files. (Cl
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from eadf7fd Downgrade severity of build-depends-on-obsolete-package
from error to warning. (Closes: #889638)
new 2901619 Only warn about bad-jar-na
tags 889638 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=eadf7fd69fa0594407cacd34cbdfe1851bf6ec7b
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 889638 + pending
Bug #889638 [lintian] lintian: please downgrade
build-depends-on-obsolete-package dh-systemd to warning
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
889638: https://
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.72
Severity: normal
Hi,
I see:
W: bit-babbler: udev-rule-missing-subsystem
lib/udev/rules.d/60-bit-babbler.rules:16 vendor/product matching missing
SUBSYSTEM specifier
But it's mistaken, because the entire rules file is guarded with:
SUBSYSTEM!="usb", GOTO="bb_e
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.72
Severity: normal
Hi,
Lintian reports the following for packages which B-D on dh-systemd
E: source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: dh-systemd => use
debhelper (>= 9.20160709)
However the suggested replacement is not possible to satisfy on Jessie
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.72
Severity: normal
And one more for today's trifecta :)
A SysV init script with:
# Default-Start: S
# Default-Stop: 0 6
Will cause lintian to complain about it not being stopped in runlevel 1,
with a rationale that would be fine for services started in
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from 51761a6 c/reporting: Improve handling of packages with errors
new eadf7fd Downgrade severity of build-depends-on-obsolete-package
from error to
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit eadf7fd69fa0594407cacd34cbdfe1851bf6ec7b
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Feb 5 08:58:50 2018 +
Downgrade severity of build-depends-on-obsolete-package f
43 matches
Mail list logo
