tags 895574 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the report!
> armhf is a bit different than the other Ubuntu architectures because
> it uses a different kind of virtualization
I suspect the underlying problem is that we are not detecting
profiling information on armhf correctly. The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 895574 + moreinfo
Bug #895574 [src:lintian] lintian: binary-compiled-with-profiling-enabled test
fails on Ubuntu's armhf
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
895574:
tags 895573 + pending
thanks
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for the report. :) Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/9cf4619805c169dd6730ce7d176c2c55e4d1b6af
data/spelling/corrections | 1 +
debian/changelog | 4
2 files changed, 5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 895573 + pending
Bug #895573 [lintian] lintian: please add spelling check: “toogle” (toggle)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
895573:
Source: lintian
Version: 2.5.81
Ubuntu runs its autopkgtests for all of its supported architectures.
One of lintian's tests (binary-compiled-with-profiling-enabled) fails
when the autopkgtest is run on armhf.
armhf is a bit different than the other Ubuntu architectures because
it uses a
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.81
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I’ve just seen a patch doing s/Toogle/Toggle/ in a package,
and lintian doesn’t check for “toogle” currently, so I thought
to report in case it might get added ;-)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unreleased
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:18:25 +
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.82
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:22:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895128: fixed in lintian 2.5.82
has caused the Debian Bug report #895128,
regarding lintian: Please loosen a little the
new-package-should-not-package-python2-module
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:22:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895370: fixed in lintian 2.5.82
has caused the Debian Bug report #895370,
regarding lintian: maintainer-script-should-not-use-recursive-chown-or-chmod
should also look for
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:22:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895175: fixed in lintian 2.5.82
has caused the Debian Bug report #895175,
regarding lintian: Argument "Users" isn't numeric in int at ...
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:22:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895284: fixed in lintian 2.5.82
has caused the Debian Bug report #895284,
regarding lintian: dh --with python3 needs dh-python, not satisfied by
lintian_2.5.82_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.5.82.dsc
lintian_2.5.82.tar.xz
lintian_2.5.82_all.deb
lintian_2.5.82_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
12 matches
Mail list logo