Re: Bug#903220: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: Please change policy to current version of debian policy in sid

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:57:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Since libconfig-model-dpkg-perl already depends on lintian, parsing > > /usr/share/lintian/data/standards-version/release-dates may be a way out. > > Beeing in sync with lintian might be a good idea since if >

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #3058

See

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3057

See Changes: [lamby] Don't emit r-data-without-readme-source by checking that .rda (etc.) -- [...truncated 238.74 KB...] Adding debian:GlobalSign_ECC_Root_CA_-_R4.pem

Bug#903470: check Creative Commons license text is the real deal, not the human-readable short hand

Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Creative Commons licenses have short human-friendly summaries, such as this for CC-BY 4.0: You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any

Bug#903435: r-data-without-readme-source should not flag non-R *.rda files

tags 903435 + pending thanks Hi Bill, > By the way this seems to be the corresponding source code: […] > Clearly it will flag any files named '*.rda' indepently of its content > or purpose. Sure. Fixed in:

Processed: Re: Bug#903435: r-data-without-readme-source should not flag non-R *.rda files

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 903435 + pending Bug #903435 [lintian] r-data-without-readme-source should not flag non-R *.rda files Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 903435:

Bug#903435: r-data-without-readme-source should not flag non-R *.rda files

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:10:58AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Bill, > > > However it seems to flags files named *.rda even when they are completly > > unrelated to R > > For example? We could fix that false-positive, rather than change the > "certainty" level.. :) The package gap-small-groups

Bug#903435: r-data-without-readme-source should not flag non-R *.rda files

Bill, > However it seems to flags files named *.rda even when they are completly > unrelated to R For example? We could fix that false-positive, rather than change the "certainty" level.. :) > ... so it is not certain. Either way, is anyone really putting any relevance into the certain/