Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

tags 914500 + pending thanks Thanks for the report. I've fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/e35d7381a9beee8665f2ed5184cda55dbf6dcefc data/files/documentation-file-regex | 3 ++- debian/changelog| 6

Processed: Re: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 914500 + pending Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #914500 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping

Processed: Bug #914500 in lintian marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m Added tag(s) pending. -- 914500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

Control: found -1 2.5.92 Hi Rafael, > Package: lintian > Version: > Severity: normal Whoops ;) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.5.92 Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m Marked as found in versions lintian/2.5.92. -- 914500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914500 Debian Bug

Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

Chris Lamb dixit: >I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical >acronymisation at this point and adopt that. If there is a >consensus and enough hunger for this to change "upstream" then >Lintian will very adopt to it. > >In that light, I've (at least) made it consistent here:

Processed: Re: lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 914538 + pending Bug #914538 [lintian] lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 914538:

Bug#914538: lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh

tags 914538 + pending thanks Stephen Kitt wrotE: > When debian/rules includes a make prefix in front of dh, the use of dh > isn’t recognised and lintian reports package-does-not-use-debhelper-or-cdbs Thanks for the report and patch which I have applied in Git (see below). FYI I could simplify

Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Control: found -1 2.5.112 Control: notfound -1 2.5.113 Control: close -1 2.5.113 On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:46:19AM +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote: > Indeed, this is fixed with lintian 2.5.113. Then please try to pay attention to the bug metadata you write while filing bugs, you explicitly wrote

Processed: Re: Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.5.112 Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version Marked as found in versions lintian/2.5.112. > notfound -1 2.5.113 Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive

Processed: Re: Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.5.112 Bug #505857 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #505857 to the same values previously set > notfound -1 2.5.113 Bug #505857

Processed: Re: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 914562 + pending Bug #914562 [lintian] lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 914562:

Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

tags 914562 + pending thanks Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Personally I’d prefer DEP-3, but the http://dep.debian.net/ site > uses “DEP 3” spelling (with ASCII space in between), except in > the URLs which have “dep3”. I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical acronymisation at

Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Hi Chris, Le 25/11/2018 à 09:42, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Hi Bertrand, > >> Lintian also doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto in debian/watch and >> reports a warning for this (see [2]). > Hm, can you quickly confirm you are using the latest Lintian? This should > have been fixed via #913761 in: > >

Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Hi Bertrand, > Lintian also doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto in debian/watch and > reports a warning for this (see [2]). Hm, can you quickly confirm you are using the latest Lintian? This should have been fixed via #913761 in: