Bug#932862: lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 11:25 -0300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Thanks for this idea and for mentioning the "superficial" Restriction; > I was not aware of that. I guess my question at this point is how you > see this interacting, if at all, with the: no-op-testsuite tag? I wo

Processed: Re: Bug#932862: lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #932862 [lintian] lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932862: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932862 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Processed: Re: Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #932870 [lintian] lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 11:26 -0300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Parallel to my comment on #932862, what would you say to simply also > emitting testsuite-autopkgtest-missing in this case (and naturally > updating the description, etc). I would say that superficial tests do pro

Bug#930487: lintian: use GitLab caching of test packages to speed up test suite CI

Hi, I'm not sure if the following is of help, as I didn't saw the involved code, but: On 19-07-20 17:28:56, Chris Lamb wrote: > I have something working except that I am running into a blocker > whereby the GitLab cache is not seen in subsequent runs. > > For example, the cache is being stored a

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #3825

See

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3824

See -- [...truncated 425.52 KB...] debian/test-out/tags/checks/scripts/scripts-interpreters/generic.t ok debian/test-out/tags/check

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3823

See Changes: [lamby] Update tests for change of severity levels. -- [...truncated 425.28 KB...] debian/test-out/tags/checks/scripts/scripts-interpreters-nodejs/generic.t

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3822

See Changes: [lamby] Correct private/generate-tag-summary to point to the new path for tag description files. -- [...truncated 427.15 KB...] debian/test-out/tags/checks

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3821

See Changes: [lamby] Also ship the 'tags' directory under /usr/share/lintian. -- [...truncated 427.12 KB...] debian/test-out/tags/checks/scripts/scripts-missing-call-to-

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3820

See Changes: [lamby] Downgrade command-in-sbin-has-manpage-in-incorrect-section to pedantic severity for the time being. (Closes: #570998) [lamby] Downgrade severity/certainty of package-supports-alternative

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3819

See -- [...truncated 248.79 KB...] # at /usr/share/perl5/Test/Perl/Critic.pm line 121. # # lib/Test/Lintian.pm:1:1:Code is not tidy # Failed test 'Test::Perl::Critic for "lib/Li

Processed: Bug#570998 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #570998 [lintian] lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages Added tag(s) pending. -- 570998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570998 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Processed: Bug#931889 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #931889 [lintian] Bogus package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script test? Bug #931847 [lintian] Bogus package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script test? Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 931847: https://bugs.de

Processed: Re: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/, }sbin do not use section 1 manpages

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 570998 2.16.0 Bug #570998 {Done: Chris Lamb } [lintian] lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages Marked as found in versions lintian/2.16.0; no longer marked as fixed in versions lintian/2.16.0 and

Processed: Re: Bug#932634: lintian: false-positive embedded-library libyaml due to matching string (defined in data/binaries/embedded-libs) with package rust-yaml-rust

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 932634 + moreinfo Bug #932634 [lintian] lintian: false-positive embedded-library libyaml due to matching string (defined in data/binaries/embedded-libs) with package rust-yaml-rust Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#932634: lintian: false-positive embedded-library libyaml due to matching string (defined in data/binaries/embedded-libs) with package rust-yaml-rust

tags 932634 + moreinfo thanks Hi Helen, > In lintian/data/binaries/embedded-libs, the criterium to detect if a > library was linked statically against libyaml is to verify the string: > > libyaml ||(?m)^did not find expected > > But this string is also found in package rust-yaml-rust. Indee

Utica

Inviato da iPhone

Processed: Re: Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 932870 + moreinfo Bug #932870 [lintian] lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 932870

Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

tags 932870 + moreinfo thanks Hi Paul, > autopkgtests that have Restrictions: superficial do not provide > significant test coverage. Please add a tag that is similar to the > testsuite-autopkgtest-missing tag that is shown when there are no > autopkgtests that are not marked as superficial. Par

Bug#932862: lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial

tags 932862 + moreinfo thanks Hi Paul, > A number of packages run cmd --version/--help in their autopkgtests. > This test doesn't really test the functionality of the command, just of > the command-line and options parsing. Thanks for this idea and for mentioning the "superficial" Restriction;

Processed: Re: Bug#932862: lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 932862 + moreinfo Bug #932862 [lintian] lintian: check for autopkgtests that do cmd --version/--help but don't have Restrictions: superficial Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

lintian_2.16.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports, buster-backports

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:24:11 -0300 Source: lintian Binary: lintian Built-For-Profiles: nocheck Architecture: source all Version: 2.16.0~bpo10+1 Distribution: buster-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Mai