Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:47 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> In case you have some hints for "speeding up" bisecting
> lintian, you could add them to some readme.
Right now I am totally in the dark. I have almost no experience with
stretch-bpo and have to think about it.
> # ---
>
Hi Felix,
On 31/10/2019 18.54, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Please have a look at coreutils >= 8.30:> It could also be related to
> libberkeleydb-perl and libmldbm-perl, but
Thanks for the pointers, but it's none of these.
So I've started bisecting between 2.29.0 and 2.30.0 ...
In case you have
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:09:52 +
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.32.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Changed-By: Chris Lamb
Closes: 943684 943724
Package: lintian
Version: 2.31.0
Running lintian on packages with many manpages is painfully slow.
Just run "apt download manpages-dev && lintian manpages-dev*.deb" to
see for yourself. On this (admittedly dated) dual core machine it
took over three minutes.
Running 'top' in a different
lintian_2.32.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.32.0.dsc
lintian_2.32.0.tar.xz
lintian_2.32.0_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.32.0 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.32.0
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943684: fixed in lintian 2.32.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #943684,
regarding lintian: Refine ‘override_dh_auto_test’ check to trigger only when
different command
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943724: fixed in lintian 2.32.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #943724,
regarding lintian: internal error in
Lintian::files::empty_package::_set_is_dummy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:21 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
Please have a look at coreutils >= 8.30:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/b8e9d04863aee57a1d9656a03bbd206525402d36
I knew it would break on stretch, having tried before. It's a
trade-off I may be able to
Package: lintian
Version: 2.31.0
Severity: important
Hi,
rebuilding lintian/2.31.0 for stretch-backports (without any further
changes) fails due to several tests failing with
Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at
Hi,
Felix Lechner:
> I also committed another fix, which I found more appropriate after
> discussing the issue with Moo's author.
Great! I almost did exactly that (it feels better indeed)
before I went with a less invasive approach :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
11 matches
Mail list logo