Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348.

2019-10-31 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:47 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > In case you have some hints for "speeding up" bisecting > lintian, you could add them to some readme. Right now I am totally in the dark. I have almost no experience with stretch-bpo and have to think about it. > # --- >

Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348.

2019-10-31 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Felix, On 31/10/2019 18.54, Felix Lechner wrote: > Please have a look at coreutils >= 8.30:> It could also be related to > libberkeleydb-perl and libmldbm-perl, but Thanks for the pointers, but it's none of these. So I've started bisecting between 2.29.0 and 2.30.0 ... In case you have

lintian_2.32.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2019-10-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:09:52 + Source: lintian Architecture: source Version: 2.32.0 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb Closes: 943684 943724

Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow

2019-10-31 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: lintian Version: 2.31.0 Running lintian on packages with many manpages is painfully slow. Just run "apt download manpages-dev && lintian manpages-dev*.deb" to see for yourself. On this (admittedly dated) dual core machine it took over three minutes. Running 'top' in a different

Processing of lintian_2.32.0_amd64.changes

2019-10-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
lintian_2.32.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.32.0.dsc lintian_2.32.0.tar.xz lintian_2.32.0_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.32.0

2019-10-31 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.32.0 at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.32.0 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#943684: marked as done (lintian: Refine ‘override_dh_auto_test’ check to trigger only when different command)

2019-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:20:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#943684: fixed in lintian 2.32.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #943684, regarding lintian: Refine ‘override_dh_auto_test’ check to trigger only when different command to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#943724: marked as done (lintian: internal error in Lintian::files::empty_package::_set_is_dummy)

2019-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:20:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#943724: fixed in lintian 2.32.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #943724, regarding lintian: internal error in Lintian::files::empty_package::_set_is_dummy to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348.

2019-10-31 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:21 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Please have a look at coreutils >= 8.30: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/b8e9d04863aee57a1d9656a03bbd206525402d36 I knew it would break on stretch, having tried before. It's a trade-off I may be able to

Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348.

2019-10-31 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: lintian Version: 2.31.0 Severity: important Hi, rebuilding lintian/2.31.0 for stretch-backports (without any further changes) fails due to several tests failing with Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at

Bug#943724: lintian: internal error in Lintian::files::empty_package::_set_is_dummy

2019-10-31 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Felix Lechner: > I also committed another fix, which I found more appropriate after > discussing the issue with Moo's author. Great! I almost did exactly that (it feels better indeed) before I went with a less invasive approach :) Cheers, -- intrigeri