Hi everyone,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:55 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> indeed, ... [my] script uses -o APT::Install-Recommends=true
Starting with the next release, your build experience will match ours.
Lintian now depends on libclass-xsaccessor-perl.
Thank you for your goodwill.
Kind
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #717595 [lintian] lintian: Please check for update-rc.d "start" and "stop"
argument usage
Bug #733156 [lintian] lintian: Please check for update-rc.d "start" and "stop"
argument usage
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Since this problem is still an issue with packages in the archive (like
x11-common), it would be nice to have lintian warn about the issues.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:10:58 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I am willing to implement this test but could you please provide
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:47 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> ./lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm:347:return scalar %{$self->groups} == 0;
I introduced the expression in commit fb7c6165. (The other line did
not break stretch.) Sorry about the massive inconvenience I caused
you.
Kind
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:47 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> ./lib/Lintian/DepMap.pm:162:unless ($parents || scalar
> %{$self->{'nodes'}{$node}{'parents'}}) {
> ./lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm:347:return scalar %{$self->groups} == 0;
Wow, I saw the second one and almost
On 01/11/2019 06.17, Felix Lechner wrote:
> I did not intentionally use features of newer Perls, but it's possible
> that it plays a role.
Found it:
https://perldoc.perl.org/perl5260delta.html#scalar(%25hash)-return-signature-changed
stretch$ perl -e '%a = (1,2,3); print scalar %a, " -- ",
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #933304 [lintian] lintian: suggest switching from debian/compat to
debhelper-compat
Added tag(s) pending.
--
933304: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package: lintian
severity: wishlist
version: 2.32.0
x-debbugs-cc: 941...@bugs.debian.org, r...@debian.org, ans...@43-1.org
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:20:59AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I think there is already a lintian warning:
> >
> >
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #943947 [lintian] lintian: outdated build-profile list - noguile is
registered, isn't it?
Added tag(s) pending.
--
943947: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 01:42:24PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> This was not the fine point I had been was trying to ask about, though. ;-)
> - I was wondering why you suggested using a gnutls specific
> profile ("pkg.gnutls28.noguile") while the BuildProfileSpec lists
> "noguile"
Package: lintian
Version: 2.32.0
Severity: normal
Hello,
I have just gotten this warning:
-
E: gnutls28 source: invalid-profile-name-in-build-profiles-field noguile guile-g
nutls
N:
N:The restriction formula in Build-Profiles field includes an unknown
N:
Bringing man-db and libseccomp maintainers into the loop.
On 2019-10-31 23:01 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:33 AM Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Running lintian on packages with many manpages is painfully slow.
>
> I can confirm that it takes a long time:
>
> $ time
Hi Sven,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:33 AM Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Running lintian on packages with many manpages is painfully slow.
I can confirm that it takes a long time:
$ time frontend/lintian ../manpages-dev_5.03-1_all.deb
I: manpages-dev:
13 matches
Mail list logo
