Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Recently I noticed a package enter Debian with a changelog something like
below. The only other change to the package was in the Maintainer
field in debian/control. Rebuilds that only change the maintainer are a waste
of buildd time, mirror sync bandwith and
Hi Sean,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:18 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> As
> discussion is ongoing in the context of Lintian, that seems premature,
> however.
The Lintian discussion was merged into a bug Guillem had filed to
further enshrine the division between native and non-native packages
Hello,
On Wed 11 Mar 2020 at 12:30PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Felix Lechner writes ("Re: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with
> 1.0 native packages [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:58 AM Ian Jackson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It works today. The only problem is the
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 12:30 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Over the years, Lintian accumulated many requests for features better
> addressed by a shell script analyzer. If there are no objections, I
> plan to assign them a copy each to morbig and shellcheck.
Some caveats that make this not as
Hi all,
I discussed the safety of `dash -n` and `bash -n` with Jakub Wilk.
These are used by lintian to check for bashisms. We concluded that it
was possibly unsafe to use the -n option with arbitrary scripts. TBH I
expect that other tools (such as binutils, see the thread below) run by
lintian
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 896012 909267
Bug #896012 [lintian] lintian: Remove tag library-not-linked-against-libc
Bug #909267 [lintian] library-not-linked-against-libc: downgrade from error
Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist'
Bug #896012 [lintian] lintian: Remove tag
Control: forcemerge 896012 909267
Hi Russ,
> I wonder if we would get all of the utility out of the tag if instead it
> looked for shared libraries with no NEEDED metadata. I think it's only
> catching libraries that aren't linked with anything else, so maybe just
> check for that explicitly?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 909267 lintian
Bug #909267 [src:lintian] library-not-linked-against-libc: downgrade from error
Bug reassigned from package 'src:lintian' to 'lintian'.
No longer marked as found in versions lintian/2.5.103.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Hi,
Over the years, Lintian accumulated many requests for features better
addressed by a shell script analyzer. If there are no objections, I
plan to assign them a copy each to morbig and shellcheck.
Many of the bugs are blocked by Bug#629247, so that's a good place to
start. Lintian will only
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #243158 [lintian] lintian: Warn if the target of a symlink in /usr/lib is
not in subdir
Added tag(s) pending.
--
243158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Enviado do meu iPhone
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #954459 [lintian] lintian: not finding bashims in maintainer scripts when
/bin/sh is /bin/bash
Added tag(s) pending.
--
954459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 954459 lintian: not finding bashims in maintainer scripts when
> /bin/sh is /bin/bash
Bug #954459 [lintian] lintian: maintainer-shell-script-fails-syntax-check
requires /bin/sh → !/bin/bash?
Changed Bug title to 'lintian: not finding
13 matches
Mail list logo
