Processed: Re: Bug#1005049: lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration"

2022-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1005049 [lintian] lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration" Added tag(s) pending. -- 1005049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1005049: lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration"

2022-02-05 Thread Felix Lechner
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi, On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 4:39 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > The code in question is as follows: The code for the serial comma is relatively well-tested. It is also used on the website. On the website, you can see that a citation is being swallowed ("social contract item

Bug#1005049: lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration"

2022-02-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Package: lintian Version: 2.114.0 Severity: minor Hi, I see output like this: N: Please refer to , Debian Developer's Reference section 3.1.4, Debian N: Policy Manual section 4.3, and Bug#755153 for details. ^^^ The code in question is as follows: sub

Bug#1005046: lintian: [false positive] very-long-line-length-in-source-file for pictures and sounds

2022-02-05 Thread Daniele Forsi
Package: lintian Version: 2.114.161 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: dfo...@gmail.com Dear maintainer, for package js8call, Lintian warns about very long lines for PNG, ICO and WAV files. I think that in these caseethe warning should be suppressed because they aren't source files for a

Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0

2022-02-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
> The test for this bug (and it should probably be recorded as an error, > not just a warning, as no Python package should have a version number > of 0.0.0) what exactly is the problem that would make it an 'error'? -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian:

Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0

2022-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: lintian Version: 2.111.0 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org I just ran into several Python packages that install modules with version number 0.0.0 because of some issue with their setup.py scripts. I just did the following on my testing system: lz4cat