Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 15:46 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > And once again: What is the sense and what right do we have to remove
> > donation
> > requests just because they use icons of paypal/pa
Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 15:10 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 13:56 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
[..]
> > > Lintian errors do not by themselves create more work to package
his to the TC's attention. I believe your actions aren't
justified.
Regards, Daniel
--
Regards,
Daniel Leidert | https://www.wgdd.de/
GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D
GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78
https://www.fiverr.com/dleidert
https://www.patr
I'm not sure why this x-post over a dozen addresses, but if you wish so...
Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 13:56 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:05:32AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The severity chosen for these tags/checks is not justified by any of our
Am Sonntag, den 21.01.2018, 02:56 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
>
> I'm also hitting this issue. I'm building the packages with pbuilder.
> Interestingly the issue currently disappears when using 'lintian
> - --keep-lab'.
Forget this. The issue is still there, independent from t
Hi,
I'm also hitting this issue. I'm building the packages with pbuilder.
Interestingly the issue currently disappears when using 'lintian -
--keep-lab'.
Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Samstag, den 05.04.2014, 23:22 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
Thanks for your bug report.
* Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de, 2014-04-05, 13:01:
Because the severity of these lintian checks is relevant to the
decision, if a package gets accepted into Debian I've added the FTP
masters
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I hereby ask for downgrading most of the privacy-breach* checks from
severity: error to pedantic.
Because the severity of these lintian checks is relevant to the decision,
if a package
Hi,
I noticed that lintian.d.o shows a lot of issues with lib64* packages.
See e.g.
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/tags/sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname.html
and just follow the links to lib64* packages. I don't think, these are correct
errors and warnings and I also do not
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We were wondering, why lintian did not complain with a
manpage-has-errors-from-man warning for a localized manpage, that showed a
cannot adjust line warning. The problem seems to be,
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please consider docbook-defguide and docbook-xml/docbook-simple as
examples. In these packages I created a build-system (docbook-defguide)
or catalogs (docbook-xml, docbook-simple). Because I use a
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.45
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The long description for outdated-autotools-helper-file should IMO refer
to the README of autotools-dev for possible solutions to fix this
lintian warning. There was discussion recently at
Just one more location, that needs to be excluded:
/usr/share/mimelnk
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.34
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm in doubt about the install-sgmlcatalog-deprecated check. It seems,
this check was added during fixing http://bugs.debian.org/90019. It
seems, we are required to put install-sgmlcatalog calls
When looking over your checks I found a serious issue: Encoding is *not*
a deprecated key! Please read appendix d of the spec.
You should further add a test for the ending semicolon of the MimeType
and the Categories field (if not empty).
Then, what is desktop-icon-not-in-xpm-format used for?
Am Dienstag, den 17.07.2007, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
When looking over your checks I found a serious issue: Encoding is *not*
a deprecated key! Please read appendix d of the spec.
Sorry. Here I was wrong. The spec indeed tells, that Encoding has been
depreciated. This has some
My 2 cents:
desktop-file-validate does not do full checks and seem to lack behind
the specification (for me it seems, it misses active maintenance). So
I'm not sure if introducing desktop-file-validate-dependent checks are
such a good idea. Maybe the idea of http://bugs.debian.org/433411 is
Am Sonntag, den 15.04.2007, 21:59 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
I would like to request a template
maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-xml-core to check for an xml-core
dependency if the maintainer-script calls update-xmlcatalog. Missing
this dependency appeared several times (probably only
18 matches
Mail list logo
