ols
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU co
a (pedentic?) test be added?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
[0] http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s07.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:26:34 +0200 Laurent Bigonville
wrote:
[...]
>
> Also note that if the check is actually correct, this will create false
> positive for all the systemd .service files not started at boot
> (scheduled jobs, dbus activated,...).
>
It's also creating
ot started at boot
(scheduled jobs, dbus activated,...).
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd
Package: lintian
Version: 2.7.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be nice to have a test for the packages that are shipping a
cron script/config file but not a systemd .timer.
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT
if this is missing?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel
= 60.2-3),
libicu-le-hb-dev, libc6-dev | libc-dev, libstdc++-6-dev | libstdc++-dev"
Is lintian confused by the alternative dependency or am I missing
something.
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (5
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.75
Severity: normal
Hi,
lintian wrongly emits gir-missing-typelib-dependency warning.
For example, libfarstream-0.2-dev depends against gir1.2-farstream-0.2,
but lintian still complains.
$ apt-file show libfarstream-0.2-dev|grep gir
libfarstream-0.2-dev:
://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=RUN%3D+path%3Adebian%2F.*%5C.default=1
Regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64
Check if a .desktop file contains an Icon entry
Closes: #854132
---
checks/menu-format.desc | 16
checks/menu-format.pm| 3 +++
t/tests/menu-format-desktop-general/debian/crlf.desktop | 1 +
Check if a .desktop file contains an Icon entry
Closes: #854132
---
checks/menu-format.desc | 14 ++
checks/menu-format.pm | 3 +++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/checks/menu-format.desc b/checks/menu-format.desc
index fd6f523b4..ee5c46f99 100644
---
-shell it fallback to the .xpm
icon. (see: #854132)
A check could also verify that a big enough icon for nowdays standards
(48x48?) is provided.
Regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.50
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Would be nice to display a check that verify if a .desktop file has an
Icon key in it.
This should probably exclude .desktop file that have NoDisplay=true and
the ones not installed in /usr/share/applications
Regards,
Laurent Bigonville
vention for the gir1.2-foo-X.Y should be checked
based on the name of the .typelib file shipped in it.
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.17
Severity: normal
Hi,
The exception for the /selinux directory should be removed as the
exception in the policy has been now removed (See: #707183).
No packages in unstable should still provide a /selinux directory ATM.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
-- System
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.13
Severity: normal
Hi,
Lintian is complaining about libgd-dev being a virtual package. But
since the 2.1 upload libgd-dev is a real package.
This package should be removed from the data/fields/virtual-packages
list.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
-- System
tag 586313 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I've made a patch that fix this bug.
The only thing that still need to be done is to write good description
for the new tags.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville checks/shared-libs | 27 +++
checks/shared-libs.desc
Hi,
Better version of the patch.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville checks/shared-libs | 28 +++
checks/shared-libs.desc| 10 +++
t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/debian/install |1 +
t/tests/shared-libs-la-files
Le Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:32:55 -0800,
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org a écrit :
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org writes:
diff --git a/checks/shared-libs b/checks/shared-libs
index 6fb812d..4ed36cf 100644
--- a/checks/shared-libs
+++ b/checks/shared-libs
@@ -164,18 +164,23 @@ for my
for checking if this .la file has a
non-empty dependency_libs field.
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
PS: The packages that are currently shipping .la files can be
found there: http://ftp-master.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt
[1] http://release.debian.org/squeeze/goals.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: normal
Hi,
Shouldn't automake1.11 be added to the list of the packages that
doesn't trigger outdated-autotools-helper-file when listed into
build-depends list?
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ
21 matches
Mail list logo
