Bug#942411: lintian: Don't report changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry on -0.* versions

Package: lintian Version: 2.27.0 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear lintian maintainers, I just triggered the following warning while using a version number appropriate for a NMU of a new upstream release: > changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry 1.13.2-1 ->

Bug#934748: lintian: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames shouldn't be reported against udebs

Package: lintian Version: 2.17.0 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Lintian maintainers, While working on a new upload of haveged, I noticed that Lintian reports package-name-doesnt-match-sonames against haveged-udeb. This is technically correct (the non-udeb

Bug#923060: lintian: Cannot make lintian happy with a NMU to *-backports

Package: lintian Version: 2.7.0 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, When preparing a NMU (python-stem/1.6.0-4~bpo9+2), I noticed the following: - - Using version number 1.6.0-4~bpo9+2, one gets a warning about the version being unsuitable for a NMU

Re: Bug #718819: python3 has circular Depends on dh-python

) Best, nicoo On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:51:29PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > However, your issue can be fixed by removing the (circular) dependency of > python3 on dh-python; as Apollon noted in a previous mail [0], this requires a > Mass Bug Filling as hundreds of packages

Bug#890358: lintian could warn when using dh --parallel in compat level >= 10

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.73 Severity: wishlist Hi, When using debhelper in compatibility mode 10 or higher, the --parallel option is enabled by default. Please consider making lintian warn about redundant use of --parallel. Best, nicoo -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:35:57PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote (12 May 2016 13:21:23 GMT) : > > Is it really necessary to wait for a policy decision? > > I might have over-interpreted Bastien's request for a bug against > policy: > https://bu

Bug#886930: lintian: Check that debian/copyright uses HTTPS in its format URI

binutils-multiarch ii dpkg-dev 1.19.0.4 ii libhtml-parser-perl3.72-3+b2 ii libtext-template-perl 1.47-1 -- no debconf information From 471593b7df4a4a42bc0d935c714d16d664e830d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <nico...@braud-santoni.eu> Date: T

Bug#843117: lintian does not warn on Essential dependencies

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.49 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, According to the Debian Policy, packages should not declare dependencies on packages tagged Essential: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-dependencies However, I noticed that lintian does not warn if,

Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor

X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucaries What's the status on this? Is it really necessary to wait for a policy decision? signature.asc Description: PGP signature