On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
Control: tags -1 -wheezy-ignore
On 2014-11-27 23:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Niels Thykier (2014-11-27 22:14:25)
[...]
In prior similar bugreport https://bugs.debian.org/760171#10 -
referenced from
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
That is correct, and I'm not arguing with that. It makes only sense
for packages that only execute avconv, and do link against directly
against libavcodec. This was the case for #748546.
Sorry, that meant to be read
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Thanks for the bug report.
* Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com, 2014-05-18, 13:43:
The libav package provides two flavors of libavcodec: libavcodecNN and
libavcodec-extra-NN, with NN being the current soname (the current
Package: lintian
Hi,
The libav package provides two flavors of libavcodec: libavcodecNN
and libavcodec-extra-NN, with NN being the current soname (the current
transition changes NN from -54 - 55).
It is not a good idea for packages to depend on libavcodec-extra-NN in
any case. Instead, packages
the error is overexaggeratd. What do you as
lintian maintainer think about this? Shall we add an override, or do you
think that lintian should be changed here? If the former, please
reassing and retitle this bug appropriately.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
