On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:37:33AM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 7:01 AM Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> > So perhaps another clause or two, something along the lines of the
> > following, would be good?
>
> Your suggestion was implemented in:
>
>
>
Hi Julian,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 7:01 AM Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> So perhaps another clause or two, something along the lines of the
> following, would be good?
Your suggestion was implemented in:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/d228765ce4db8057fd0c9780b2312c0e26914434
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:33:14AM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 2:27 AM Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> > *If* the consensus is that py3versions -r is wrong, then we should
> > probably have a lintian check for it: py3versions -r (and variants
> > such as -rv and -vr)
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 2:27 AM Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> *If* the consensus is that py3versions -r is wrong, then we should
> probably have a lintian check for it: py3versions -r (and variants
> such as -rv and -vr) without a corresponding X-Python3-Version field
> should give a lintian
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 05:15:52AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is certainly not a major issue, but your py3versions invocation in the
> autopkgtest is sub-optimal. You are using -r for requested versions, but
> then the package doesn't request specific versions so if falls back to all
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
