Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Felix Lechner, le dim. 09 janv. 2022 09:32:07 -0800, a ecrit: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 8:51 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > But what is "latest version"? > > The latest version is the most recent commit on the 'master' branch in > our public repository. [1] We found it is the fastest way to bri

Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 8:51 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > But what is "latest version"? The latest version is the most recent commit on the 'master' branch in our public repository. [1] We found it is the fastest way to bring bug fixes to the community. Bug fixes can often be verified on ou

Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Felix Lechner, le dim. 09 janv. 2022 08:15:27 -0800, a ecrit: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 7:36 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > we cannot > > write lintian overrides files that avoid red flags on both platforms. > > Lintian's latest version will always be authoritative. But what is "latest version

Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 7:36 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > we cannot > write lintian overrides files that avoid red flags on both platforms. Lintian's latest version will always be authoritative. In addition, please note that the format for override files is changing. [1] Please remember, h

Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Mattia Rizzolo, le dim. 09 janv. 2022 15:58:31 +0100, a ecrit: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:39:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > With lintian's current tendency of changing its output, we have to adapt > > the suppression rules. But it appears that qa.debian.org and salsa's CI > > rules are no

Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use

2022-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:39:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > With lintian's current tendency of changing its output, we have to adapt > the suppression rules. But it appears that qa.debian.org and salsa's CI > rules are not using the same version of lintian, so we are stuck with > either havi