On 2024-05-24 01:55, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Hi,
On 2024-05-23 23:52, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
On 2024-05-22 16:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Julian!
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
But here I'd suggest doing the
opposite: checking for valid build options
Hi,
On 2024-05-23 23:52, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
On 2024-05-22 16:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Julian!
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
But here I'd suggest doing the
opposite: checking for valid build options (and note: this is a check
for
On 2024-05-22 16:36, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Julian!
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
But here I'd suggest doing the
opposite: checking for valid build options (and note: this is a check
for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, not for DEB_BUILD_PROFILES). There is a very
short
Hi Julian!
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> But here I'd suggest doing the
> opposite: checking for valid build options (and note: this is a check
> for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, not for DEB_BUILD_PROFILES). There is a very
> short list of standard build options: those
Hi Nilesh,
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 12:27:02PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Julian Gilbey :
> > I have come across a number of packages with a line in their
> > debian/rules like:
> >
> > ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> >
> > This should be "nodoc", according to the
Julian Gilbey :
> I have come across a number of packages with a line in their
> debian/rules like:
>
> ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>
> This should be "nodoc", according to the "nodoc" entry in
> https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec#Registered_profile_names
>
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> tags 1070770 patch
> thanks
>
> I've created a patch on Salsa that creates a new Lintian check for this.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/504
Amazing, thanks!
I've added a bunch of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1070770 patch
Bug #1070770 [lintian] lintian: check for testing presence of "nodocs" in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1070770:
tags 1070770 patch
thanks
I've created a patch on Salsa that creates a new Lintian check for this.
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/504
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 1070770 po...@debian.org
Bug #1070770 [lintian] lintian: check for testing presence of "nodocs" in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Owner recorded as po...@debian.org.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: lintian
Version: 2.117.0
Severity: wishlist
I have come across a number of packages with a line in their
debian/rules like:
ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
This should be "nodoc", according to the "nodoc" entry in
11 matches
Mail list logo
