Hi,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
I should also say that those should also be fixed IMO:
I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-i386
[build-depends: libselinux1-dev (= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386
!kfreebsd-amd64]]
I: dpkg source:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
I should also say that those should also be fixed IMO:
I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-i386
[build-depends: libselinux1-dev (= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
It's probably worth noting here that there's no specification for
either in Policy, so they really are unknown in that sense. That won't
stop me from adding them to Lintian's list, since we added
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: normal
I always get:
I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control bugs
I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control origin
Since dpkg-gencontrol propagates Origin and Bugs fields to binary packages,
lintian should accept them in binary packages.
Thus you need to
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: normal
I always get:
I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control bugs
I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control origin
Since dpkg-gencontrol propagates Origin and Bugs fields to binary packages,
lintian should
5 matches
Mail list logo