Bug#916877: lintian: check that 1.2-3~debXuY changelog stanza follows a 1.2-3 changelog stanza

2018-12-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 07:23:12PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > > IIRC this particular change was actually not based on a rebuild of the > > unstable's one but an import of 3.4.2 on top of the previous stretch > > packaging. > > Getcha. This sounds like a case that is

Bug#916877: lintian: check that 1.2-3~debXuY changelog stanza follows a 1.2-3 changelog stanza

2018-12-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Salvatore, > IIRC this particular change was actually not based on a rebuild of the > unstable's one but an import of 3.4.2 on top of the previous stretch > packaging. Getcha. This sounds like a case that is special enough that it is fine for Lintian to warn about normally, no? (I mean, IMHO

Bug#916877: lintian: check that 1.2-3~debXuY changelog stanza follows a 1.2-3 changelog stanza

2018-12-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 08:50:09PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: lintian > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > I just wanted to answer "Is #910434 fixed in sid?" but the changelog > entry is inconclusive ... > > > spamassassin (3.4.2-1~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high > > * lots of

Bug#916877: lintian: check that 1.2-3~debXuY changelog stanza follows a 1.2-3 changelog stanza

2018-12-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Hi, I just wanted to answer "Is #910434 fixed in sid?" but the changelog entry is inconclusive ... spamassassin (3.4.2-1~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high * lots of changes spamassassin (3.4.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium * lost of changes ... I would