Just some small comments:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:05:19PM +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:48:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Do you maybe have an idea how we could enable the devref four part
section number links. Maybe it could fall back to the three part
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:22:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Some comments regarding your patches:
Thanks for your comments. Everything should be fixed now.
I also made a few more improvements: links to manpages.d.n for man
references, and support for the remaining manuals (debconf-spec,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 06:08:03AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Is it still your feeling that this isn't ready to get merged? Since
we now internally abandonded lenny for the unstable versions, I see no
real reason against merging it from our side.
Yes. I'll be reviewing and polishing it
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:34:00PM +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:22:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Some comments regarding your patches:
Thanks for your comments. Everything should be fixed now.
I also made a few more improvements: links to manpages.d.n for man
Some comments regarding your patches:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:41:40PM +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
+my $ddoc_title = 'title(.+?)\/title';
+my $ddoc_ref = 'a href=(.+?)([A-Z]|[A-Z]?[\d\.]+?)\.?\s+'.
+ '([\w\s[:punct:]]+?)\/a';
+my @ddoc_fields = [ [ 'url' ], [ 'section' ], [
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
Finally, the changes to the code are available at git.d.o[7][8], but
note that it is not yet ready to be merged and I may rearrange commits
if needed (so don't be surprised if you see weird things in the log
after pulling new stuff, a
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:40:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
In that world, there are a whole pile of tags in Lintian right now that
have no Ref information at all. These tags fall roughly into the
following categories:
* Tags we issue for things that are just obviously broken, even if not
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:28:25PM +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
The status of links on lintian.d.o has been bothering me for a while as
well. lib/manual_refs is terribly outdated and manual_refs_update.pl is
broken, so I tried to fix the problems (and implement some new features
as well).
I have
(I sent this message yesterday, but it looks like it hasn't reached the
list yet. I'm sending it again because other mails sent later have been
processed, and also because the original mail included suspicious
attachments - a patch with ~900 URLs - which I will simply link this
time instead.)
On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Btw, I didn't say much about Source:, but that's because I was thinking
of reusing Ref: which already has the relevant information. Though some
standardization wouldn't hurt: using the document ID as defined by
doc-base instead of its title (and optional debian-
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Btw, I didn't say much about Source:, but that's because I was thinking
of reusing Ref: which already has the relevant information. Though some
standardization wouldn't hurt: using the document ID as defined by
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:13:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
In practice, there are a few checks that take up a *lot* of time (man page
processing, for example), and most checks are fairly fast once you have
all the data collected anyway. Currently, the split between checks/*
scripts is a
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Checks:
po-debconf 954.981
fields 776.158
cruft425.962
standards-version277.267
control-file 231.320
patch-systems192.197
debhelper 60.784
rules
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yes, standardization would be excellent here, as well as adding more
keywords to the translator that turns them into nice descriptions for
the web and for -i output.
The one thing this
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yes, standardization would be excellent here, as well as adding more
keywords to the translator that turns them into nice descriptions for the
web and for -i output.
The one thing this doesn't give us is distinguishing between the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:13:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The plus is that the basic format uses the same terms that people are
already familiar with, even though we also have support for tuning the
output for things like ftp-master. The drawback is that we're not pushing
people towards
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:13:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The plus is that the basic format uses the same terms that people are
already familiar with, even though we also have support for tuning the
output for things like ftp-master. The drawback is
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have not been explaining much about the Lintian GSoC project. In the
following paragraphs I'll try to summarize how it is coming along, as
well as what are the current issues and future directions.
Thank you for the update!
So far, more than 50% of all
I have not been explaining much about the Lintian GSoC project. In the
following paragraphs I'll try to summarize how it is coming along, as
well as what are the current issues and future directions.
Tag classification
--
So far, more than 50% of all the tags in checks/*.desc
19 matches
Mail list logo
