On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:52:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
lintian_embedded-php-library:
yet another PHP-related check for embedded copies, none making part of PEAR,
based on the embedded-code-copies list. Note that there's also another
disabled line which is for a package that is also
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:52:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
lintian_xinha:
adds a, currently commented, entry for xinha, which is already packaged but
not yet in the archive; so it can be kept as a reminder to enable it as
soon as the package reaches the archive.
applied
--
Frank
W: djpig should-not-send-copy-of-message to atomo64
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:52:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
lintian_embedded-php-library:
yet another PHP-related check for embedded copies, none making part of
PEAR, based on the embedded-code-copies list.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:23:34PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:52:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
lintian_embedded-php-library:
yet another PHP-related check for embedded copies, none making part of
PEAR, based on the
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:23:34PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:52:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
lintian_embedded-php-library:
yet another PHP-related check for embedded copies, none making part of
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 01:04 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've no idea against which tree you make these patches but it certainly
is not master.
From your patch (checks/files.desc):
Please depend on the respective PEAR package providing the module and
make sure the library can be
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
well, some files do have a string that would be matched, but probably
m,/pear[/.], is a better regex. That's the main drawnback: there's no
easy way to tell whether it is a PEAR module or not. PHP, the world of
inconsistencies
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggested m,/pear[/.], as it would also match
$Header: /repository/pear/Log/Log.php,v 1.69 2008/01/19 22:20:55 jon Exp $
which is what php-log's Log.php use.
Done.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Attached is a git-am-friendly mbox file containing the patches making
lintian check for embedded copies of jsjac and jsMath, and adds another
tag checking for embedded copies of PHP PEAR modules (there are lots of
those in the
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is a git-am-friendly mbox file containing the patches making
lintian check for embedded copies of jsjac and jsMath,
This part is applied. Thanks!
and adds another tag checking for embedded copies of PHP PEAR modules
(there are lots of
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
and adds another tag checking for embedded copies of PHP PEAR modules
(there are lots of those in the wild).
I think I'm going to decline to apply this one in its current form, or
with m/pear/, since the false positive risk
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That part was done in pourpose (not even /Filename is required on all
cases) because some times some people do rename the files and add a
comment or two but the code remains intact. Not even as an experimental
tag using m,/pear/,?
Oh, hey, good
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That part was done in pourpose (not even /Filename is required on all
cases) because some times some people do rename the files and add a
comment or two but the code remains intact. Not even as an experimental
tag using m,/pear/,?
Er, this string
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
That part was done in pourpose (not even /Filename is required on all
cases) because some times some people do rename the files and add a
comment or two but the code remains intact. Not even as an experimental
tag using
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well, some files do have a string that would be matched, but probably
m,/pear[/.], is a better regex. That's the main drawnback: there's no
easy way to tell whether it is a PEAR module or not. PHP, the world of
inconsistencies :)
I'm currently
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is a git-am-friendly mbox file containing the patches making
lintian check for embedded copies of jsjac and jsMath, and adds another
tag checking for embedded copies of PHP PEAR modules (there are lots of
those in the wild).
+ #
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
lintian_maintpatch:
Adds a check for maintainer scripts modifying the php.ini file (only
checks the preinst script as it is safe if done on the postrm to
rollback the changes). I believe the description of the new tag is
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
lintian_improvedpatch:
I made a couple of changes so it matches bla bla bla at the same time,
and to make it catch all of the duplicated lines on the same line.
Applied with a few fixes:
Thanks! :)
---
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adds a check for maintainer scripts modifying the php.ini file (only
checks the preinst script as it is safe if done on the postrm to
rollback the changes). I believe the description of
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lintian_maintpatch:
Adds a check for maintainer scripts modifying the php.ini file (only
checks the preinst script as it is safe if done on the postrm to
rollback the changes). I believe the description of the new tag is clear
enough.
The
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lintian_improvedpatch:
I made a couple of changes so it matches bla bla bla at the same time,
and to make it catch all of the duplicated lines on the same line.
Applied with a few fixes:
--- a/checks/description
+++ b/checks/description
@@
21 matches
Mail list logo
