Re: lintian.d.o back up and running

2008-12-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 12:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: On Mon, December 22, 2008 22:28, Russ Allbery wrote: The full archive run completed, I ran another incremental, and I've now reactivated the cron job. lintian.d.o should now be back to

Re: lintian.d.o back up and running

2008-12-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 12:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Please do -- this looks obviously correct to me. Once you do, I'll release 2.1.3 and, since I think the effect of this will require another complete rebuild anyway, do the upgrade at the

Re: lintian.d.o back up and running

2008-12-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, December 22, 2008 22:28, Russ Allbery wrote: The full archive run completed, I ran another incremental, and I've now reactivated the cron job. lintian.d.o should now be back to normal. Unfortunately incremental runs are currently broken, as changed-packages.list is always empty. A

Re: lintian.d.o back up and running

2008-12-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: On Mon, December 22, 2008 22:28, Russ Allbery wrote: The full archive run completed, I ran another incremental, and I've now reactivated the cron job. lintian.d.o should now be back to normal. Unfortunately incremental runs are currently

lintian.d.o back up and running

2008-12-22 Thread Russ Allbery
The full archive run completed, I ran another incremental, and I've now reactivated the cron job. lintian.d.o should now be back to normal. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with