lintian: r626 - trunk/debian

2006-04-21 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2006-04-21 18:48:42 +0200 (Fri, 21 Apr 2006) New Revision: 626 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Finalize changes for 1.23.17. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2006-04-18

lintian: r627 - releases

2006-04-21 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2006-04-21 18:57:11 +0200 (Fri, 21 Apr 2006) New Revision: 627 Added: releases/1.23.17/ Log: Tag 1.23.17 release. Copied: releases/1.23.17 (from rev 626, trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#360216: marked as done (lintian: maintainer-script-built-with-broken-debhelper-version fires in non-debhelper case)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360216: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#278290: marked as done (could check for python build-dep when dh_python is used)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#278290: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#257650: marked as done ([collection/debfiles,checks/changelog] should cope with changelog beeing a symlink)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#257650: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#359646: marked as done (check for substvars file in Debian-Diff)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#359646: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#357433: marked as done (please add kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Bug#357245: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64))

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357433: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#360711: marked as done (lintian: [lintian-info] improve diagnostics of package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360711: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#357636: marked as done (shlib-without-PT_GNU_STACK-section check not valid for all arches?)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357636: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#353659: marked as done (lintian: Check for direct use of init.d, when invoke-rc.d should be used instead)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353659: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#361986: marked as done (lintian: Indices is a valid template field for (c)debconf)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361986: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#88021: marked as done ([new check (checks/rules?)] Ensure that debian/rules is a makefile and parse for common problems)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#311786: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#347169: marked as done ([new check] warn about using X meta packages in dependencies)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347169: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#361644: marked as done ([checks/scripts] please add lua50 to the list of valid interpreters)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361644: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#261891: marked as done ([new check] similar dependency checks for ucf as for debconf?)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#261891: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#355032: marked as done (lintian: [Should be ERROR, not warning] W: package-foo: unknown-section unknown)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#355032: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#242789: marked as done (lintian: check if dh_clean is used in debian/rules clean without a debhelper dependency in Build-Depends)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#242789: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#360534: marked as done (canonical path for zsh)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360534: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#360214: marked as done (lintian: typo in maintainer-script-built-with-broken-debhelper-version)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360214: fixed in lintian 1.23.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now