Bug#231770: lintian: Add checks for prompting in maintainerscripts

tags 231770 +patch thanks Hi Easy patch included for consideration. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D diff -Nru lintian-1.23.28/checks/scripts lintian-1.23.28.new/checks/scripts

Processed: Re: lintian: bogus compat check

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 330025 +patch Bug#330025: [checks/debhelper] should warn that DH_COMPAT is deprecated There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#231770: lintian: Add checks for prompting in maintainerscripts

Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tags 231770 +patch thanks Hi Easy patch included for consideration. My concern about the simple approach to this (which I never sent to the bug; my bad) is that the other major use of read besides prompting is for parsing files. It's not uncommon to see

Bug#330025: lintian: bogus compat check

Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tags 330025 +patch thanks Hi Easy patch included for consideration. Thanks! At this point I'm tempted to take this, although I think that CDBS still uses DH_COMPAT rather than a debian/compat file (but I'm not positive, and regardless this sort of check

Bug#330025: lintian: bogus compat check

Russ Allbery wrote: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tags 330025 +patch thanks Hi Easy patch included for consideration. Thanks! At this point I'm tempted to take this, although I think that CDBS still uses DH_COMPAT rather than a debian/compat file (but I'm not positive, and

Bug#330025: lintian: bogus compat check

Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to joeyh it's appropriate to warn for use of DH_COMPAT at the top of the file (before any Makefile target). Thank you for checking on this! I'll get this merged for the next release. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Bug#406731: reopen: bug still exists in source: check

Package: lintian Version: 1.23.28 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- For some reason, this bug has not actually gone - the source check is still complaining: lintian -o /path/build-area/emdebian-tools_0.1.5_amd64.changes W: emdebian-tools source: uploader-not-full-name Wookey

Bug#418105: lintian: Add a new interpreter: jruby0.9

Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.28 Severity: wishlist Can we have jruby0.9 added to the list of known interepreters ? W: jruby0.9: unusual-interpreter ./usr/lib/jruby0.9/bin/jirb #!jruby0.9 Thanks a lot, What package provides jruby0.9 and

Bug#418217: lintian: Please check for identical, non-linked binaries.

Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.28 Severity: wishlist lintian could check for identical binaries without the use of a symlink or hard link. For examples of what this should catch, see bugs 382724, 382728, and 382730. It's not immediately clear to me

Bug#418105: lintian: Add a new interpreter: jruby0.9

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:40:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: What package provides jruby0.9 and what's the canonical path to the interpretor? jruby0.9 is the package, /usr/bin/jruby0.9 is a link: lrwxrwxrwx [...] /usr/bin/jruby0.9 - ../lib/jruby0.9/bin/jruby Also, is there no jruby

Bug#417912: lintian: tells about missing manpage on incorrect _binary_ location

Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.28 Severity: normal Hello, due to a packaging bug we got the binaries installed into the wrong location: /usr/bin/bin /usr/bin/bin/svn-inject /usr/bin/bin/svn-buildpackage /usr/bin/bin/svn-upgrade However,

lintian: r840 - in trunk: checks debian testset testset/filenames/debian testset/manpages/debian

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 04:25:06 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 840 Modified: trunk/checks/files trunk/checks/files.desc trunk/checks/manpages trunk/debian/changelog trunk/testset/filenames/debian/rules trunk/testset/manpages/debian/rules

lintian: r841 - in trunk: checks debian

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 04:30:00 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 841 Modified: trunk/checks/cruft trunk/checks/cruft.desc trunk/debian/changelog Log: + [RA] Allow a build dependency on automake to satisfy the autotools-dev requirement since users may use autoreconf to

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r840

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r840 by rra tag 417912 + pending Bug#417912: lintian: tells about missing manpage on incorrect _binary_ location There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r842

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r842 by rra tag 330025 + pending Bug#330025: [checks/debhelper] should warn that DH_COMPAT is deprecated Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please

lintian: r843 - in trunk: checks debian

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 05:13:49 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 843 Modified: trunk/checks/debconf trunk/debian/changelog Log: * checks/debconf: + [RA] Rather than munging dependencies to cope with the various implementations of debconf, take advantage of our new

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r843

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r843 by rra tag 349616 + pending Bug#349616: lintian: wrongly states that there is no dependency for debconf using settitle There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r844

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r844 by rra tag 416140 + pending Bug#416140: lintian: Should warn about the needed debconf version for packages using error debconf templates There were no tags set. Tags added:

lintian: r845 - in trunk: debian doc frontend lib man

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 06:05:08 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 845 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/doc/README trunk/frontend/lintian trunk/frontend/lintian-info trunk/lib/Tags.pm trunk/man/lintian.1 Log: Fix the color output to work the way sketched out in

lintian: r846 - in trunk: checks debian

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 06:09:51 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 846 Modified: trunk/checks/scripts trunk/debian/changelog Log: + [RA] Add /usr/bin/jruby0.9, provided by jruby0.9. Thanks, Sebastien Delafond. (Closes: #418105) Modified: trunk/checks/scripts

lintian: r847 - trunk/debian

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 06:11:30 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 847 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Prepare the 1.23.29 upload. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2007-04-11

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r846

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r846 by rra tag 418105 + pending Bug#418105: lintian: Add a new interpreter: jruby0.9 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

lintian: r848 - releases

Author: rra Date: 2007-04-11 06:18:10 +0200 (Wed, 11 Apr 2007) New Revision: 848 Added: releases/1.23.29/ Log: Tag 1.23.29 release. Copied: releases/1.23.29 (from rev 847, trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Processing of lintian_1.23.29_i386.changes

lintian_1.23.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_1.23.29.dsc lintian_1.23.29.tar.gz lintian_1.23.29_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

lintian_1.23.29_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lintian_1.23.29.dsc to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.29.dsc lintian_1.23.29.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.29.tar.gz lintian_1.23.29_all.deb to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.29_all.deb Override entries for your package: lintian_1.23.29.dsc - source devel

Bug#418105: marked as done (lintian: Add a new interpreter: jruby0.9)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#418105: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#416140: marked as done (lintian: Should warn about the needed debconf version for packages using error debconf templates)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#416140: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412406: marked as done (outdated-autotools-helper-file: false positive if autotools-dev is first build dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#412406: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412577: marked as done (doesn't understand 'emergency' urgency)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#412577: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#406731: marked as done (lintian: please consider removing maintainer-not-full-name check)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#406731: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#349616: marked as done (lintian: wrongly states that there is no dependency for debconf using settitle)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349616: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#373668: marked as done (linitan: [source-contains-CVS-dir] enhance lintian-info description)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#373668: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#417067: marked as done (lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file doesn't apply if package build-depends on autoconf/automake)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#417067: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#403515: marked as done (Please add gambas2 interpreter to lintian)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403515: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#403553: marked as done (unknown-field-in-dsc: support autobuild and vcs-* fields)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403553: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#401881: marked as done (archive section mismatch is over-zealous)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#401881: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#409108: marked as done (lintian: [improve message] W: bzrtools source: changelog-should-mention-nmu)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409108: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#409122: marked as done (lintian: [lintian-info] A small fix to declares-possibly-conflicting-debhelper-compat-versions)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409122: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#402319: marked as done (lintian: does not detect `inet-superserver' for update-inetd)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#402319: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#406349: marked as done (lintian: Some tests contain 'usr-doc' which should be 'usr-share-doc')

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#406349: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#417912: marked as done (lintian: tells about missing manpage on incorrect _binary_ location)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#417912: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#330025: marked as done ([checks/debhelper] should warn that DH_COMPAT is deprecated)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:01 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330025: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#373918: marked as done (lintian: Add checks for malformed (Closes ...) statements)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#373918: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#402662: marked as done (lintian: incomplete newer-debconf-templates check)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#402662: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#399714: marked as done (ANSI color output (attached))

Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399714: fixed in lintian 1.23.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now