On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:30:24 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Now that I go and look at the code, I remember what's going on here. We
dropped the allowance and requirement for libmodule-build-perl in 2.1.0.
+ [RA] Stop checking for a libmodule-build-perl build dependency since
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
I'm starting a clean run on the entire archive with 2.2.0, which will
hopefully also clear up the sorting of binary packages by source package
version.
There's still a memory leak in checking source packages. Lintian grew to
389MB of memory while doing
Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
There's still a memory leak in checking source packages. Lintian grew to
389MB of memory while doing the source package run. It looks like we've
killed the leaks for binary packages, though; the memory seems to be
stable now that it's doing those.
I just took a
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 1d424401fbdaf61931f40526807059f78d8a3ca1
Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
Date: Sat Jan 24 17:55:01 2009 -0800
Use git fetch rather than git pull for the lintian.d.o update
diff --git a/reporting/checkout-release
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit d85929d96bb021fad042d6107e59adf0d0c944a7
Author: Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jan 25 14:03:21 2009 -0600
checks/cruft cleanup
Remove unused variable and make a variable that should be local local, not
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 5c600121d8c9bb2f278ac87d185ae155010c078b
Author: Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jan 25 14:13:39 2009 -0600
Remove unused module in checks/patch-systems
Signed-off-by: Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 2db1892ce91e3946f56a2e47fcbc2be13d7973d5
Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
Date: Sun Jan 25 12:52:24 2009 -0800
Add references to the UsingSymbolsFiles wiki page
* checks/shared-libs.desc:
+ [RA] Add
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com writes:
I just took a quick look at the source-related checks and didn't find
much, just some unused global variables and an unused pm. The attached
mbox contains the patches reflecting the cleanup.
Thanks, applied.
Yeah, I did the same look and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
tags 421549 - moreinfo
Bug#421549: [checks/fields] false positive with libmodule-build-perl in
Build-Depends
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
End of message,
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 641854da8e53aa9bb18ac5c4df13b79b8651ea5a
Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
Date: Sun Jan 25 14:22:36 2009 -0800
Allow but don't require libmodule-build-perl dependencies
* checks/fields:
+ [RA] Allow but do
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit c6b2da1257af0f2f722a41a077e2e78b26b722c2
Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
Date: Sun Jan 25 14:25:02 2009 -0800
Add missing test descriptions
diff --git a/t/tests/basic-non-native/desc b/t/tests/basic-non-native/desc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
# via tagpending
#
# lintian (2.2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * checks/fields:
#+ [RA] Allow but do not require a libmodule-build-perl dependency if
#
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
# via tagpending
#
# lintian (2.2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * checks/fields:
#+ [RA] Allow but do not require a libmodule-build-perl dependency if
# the Build script is referenced in clean. Thanks, Charles
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:25:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
# * checks/fields:
#+ [RA] Allow but do not require a libmodule-build-perl dependency if
# the Build script is referenced in clean. Thanks, Charles Plessy and
# gregor herrmann. (Closes: #421549)
That was quick - thanks
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Proposed check info:
Tag: using-first-person-in-description
Severity: minor
Certainty: possible
Info: You should avoid the use of first person (I will do this... or
We recommend...). The computer is not a person and the
15 matches
Mail list logo
