Bug#858588: lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units

On 08/02/18 at 22:43 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 858588 + pending > thanks > > Okay, after confusing myself even more for a bit, this is now > pending upload: > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=0848266e444d029c6fa826f1a6d3e8dd2dad0739 Thanks! - Lucas

Bug#889486: marked as done (Please check for packages named "dh-*" in binary-package-depends-on-toolchain-package)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889486: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889486, regarding Please check for packages named "dh-*" in binary-package-depends-on-toolchain-package

Bug#889746: marked as done (lintian: several suggestion to override_dh_auto-test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES metadata)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889746: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889746, regarding lintian: several suggestion to override_dh_auto-test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

Bug#889591: marked as done (lintian: emits package-does-not-install-examples although all examples are installed)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889591: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889591, regarding lintian: emits package-does-not-install-examples although all examples are installed to

Bug#889535: marked as done (lintian: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /srv/lintian.debian.org/lintian/lib/Lintian/Path.pm line 326.)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889535: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889535, regarding lintian: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at

Bug#889489: marked as done (lintian: improve description of maintainer-script-should-not-use-recursive-chown-or-chmod)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889489: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889489, regarding lintian: improve description of

Bug#889628: marked as done (lintian: False-positive bad-jar-name)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889628: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889628, regarding lintian: False-positive bad-jar-name to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#889760: marked as done (lintian: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license should check for NOTICE file in jar file)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889760: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889760, regarding lintian: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license should check for NOTICE file in jar

Bug#889814: marked as done (lintian: Improve long description of epoch-change-without-comment)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889814: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889814, regarding lintian: Improve long description of epoch-change-without-comment to be marked as done.

Bug#889592: marked as done (lintian: false positive for override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889592: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889592, regarding lintian: false positive for override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES to

Bug#889856: marked as done (lintian: please add a new control-tarball-compression-format classification tag)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889856: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889856, regarding lintian: please add a new control-tarball-compression-format classification tag to be

Processed: Re: lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 858588 + pending Bug #858588 [lintian] lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 858588:

Bug#858588: lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units

tags 858588 + pending thanks Okay, after confusing myself even more for a bit, this is now pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=0848266e444d029c6fa826f1a6d3e8dd2dad0739 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'`

Accepted lintian 2.5.74 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:41:55 + Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.74 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris

lintian_2.5.74_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:41:55 + Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.74 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #183

See Changes: [lamby] Rework the no missing systemd .service detection. (Closes: #858588) [lamby] Drop trailing whitespace. -- [...truncated 246.15 KB...]

Processing of lintian_2.5.74_amd64.changes

lintian_2.5.74_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.5.74.dsc lintian_2.5.74.tar.xz lintian_2.5.74_all.deb lintian_2.5.74_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#889639: marked as done (lintian: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false positive)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#869547: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #869547, regarding lintian: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false positive to be marked as done. This means

Bug#869547: marked as done (udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889639: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889639, regarding udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO to be marked as

Bug#889639: marked as done (lintian: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false positive)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889639: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889639, regarding lintian: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false positive to be marked as done. This means

Bug#889638: marked as done (lintian: please downgrade build-depends-on-obsolete-package dh-systemd to warning)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889638: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889638, regarding lintian: please downgrade build-depends-on-obsolete-package dh-systemd to warning to be

[lintian] branch master updated (25fad35 -> 0848266)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 25fad35 Add a classification tag for the control tarball compression format. (Closes: #889856) new 0848266 Rework the no missing systemd

Bug#817170: marked as done (lintian: warn when (systemd) service units install themselves into an unusual target)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#817170: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #817170, regarding lintian: warn when (systemd) service units install themselves into an unusual target to

Bug#869547: marked as done (udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#869547: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #869547, regarding udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO to be marked as

Bug#858588: marked as done (lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#858588: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #858588, regarding lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units to be marked as done. This means

Bug#738442: marked as done (lintian: Possibility to provide stats on .deb member compressors)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#738442: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #738442, regarding lintian: Possibility to provide stats on .deb member compressors to be marked as done.

Bug#762113: marked as done (lintian: Report when .jar files contain the Java source)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#762113: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #762113, regarding lintian: Report when .jar files contain the Java source to be marked as done. This

Bug#756130: marked as done (lintian: Please spell check patch headers)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#756130: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #756130, regarding lintian: Please spell check patch headers to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#679124: marked as done (lintian: error on d/rules having dh_make templates)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#679124: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #679124, regarding lintian: error on d/rules having dh_make templates to be marked as done. This means

Bug#889102: marked as done ([lintian] Please detect source missing .wasm file)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:06:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#889102: fixed in lintian 2.5.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #889102, regarding [lintian] Please detect source missing .wasm file to be marked as done. This means that

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #184

See Changes: [lamby] Release lintian/2.5.74 into unstable. [lamby] Open new changelog entry for 2.5.75. -- [...truncated 246.22 KB...] Adding

[lintian] 01/01: Drop trailing whitespace.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 3b09f0a0d0492a8919ce499b8950b2db0e6db7c5 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 17:37:00 2018 + Drop trailing whitespace. ---

[lintian] branch master updated (0848266 -> 3b09f0a)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 0848266 Rework the no missing systemd .service detection. (Closes: #858588) new 3b09f0a Drop trailing whitespace. The 1 revisions listed

[lintian] 01/01: Rework the no missing systemd .service detection. (Closes: #858588)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 0848266e444d029c6fa826f1a6d3e8dd2dad0739 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 16:59:35 2018 + Rework the no missing systemd .service

[lintian] annotated tag 2.5.74 created (now 4150e10)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to annotated tag 2.5.74 in repository lintian. at 4150e10 (tag) tagging 9dcfbf6f02296c08492795b783d75ec6a8bc8d6f (commit) replaces 2.5.73 tagged by Chris Lamb on Thu Feb 8

[lintian] branch master updated (3b09f0a -> 9dcfbf6)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 3b09f0a Drop trailing whitespace. new 9dcfbf6 Release lintian/2.5.74 into unstable. The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to

[lintian] 01/01: Release lintian/2.5.74 into unstable.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 9dcfbf6f02296c08492795b783d75ec6a8bc8d6f Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 17:43:13 2018 + Release lintian/2.5.74 into unstable.

[lintian] 01/01: Open new changelog entry for 2.5.75.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 4a66a4fd4f11473a4bd27a4cf3af4c2b850e85a1 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 18:00:52 2018 + Open new changelog entry for 2.5.75.

[lintian] branch master updated (9dcfbf6 -> 4a66a4f)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 9dcfbf6 Release lintian/2.5.74 into unstable. new 4a66a4f Open new changelog entry for 2.5.75. The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are

[lintian] 01/01: Whoops, override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES was renamed, not removed.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit fbcaedc5cc84ba8f395f72cee5f7d39d5676bfeb Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 22:09:30 2018 + Whoops,

[lintian] branch master updated (4a66a4f -> fbcaedc)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 4a66a4f Open new changelog entry for 2.5.75. new fbcaedc Whoops, override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES was renamed, not

Bug#820770: Bug#889640: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop misfire on rcS scripts

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:50:28PM +1030, Ron wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:32:55AM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote: > > tags 820770 + moreinfo > > thanks > > > > > > Hi Ron and Felipe, > > > > Hm, are #820770 and #889640 the same issue? If so, we should either > > close them both or reopen both

Bug#889640: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop misfire on rcS scripts)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2018 03:02:24 +0530 with message-id <1518125544.2950310.1264553464.229d9...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts has caused the Debian Bug report #820770, regarding

Bug#820770: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2018 03:02:24 +0530 with message-id <1518125544.2950310.1264553464.229d9...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts has caused the Debian Bug report #820770, regarding

Processed: Re: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 820770 - moreinfo Bug #820770 [lintian] lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 820770 + wontfix Bug #820770 [lintian] lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #185

See -- [...truncated 246.18 KB...] Adding debian:Certplus_Root_CA_G1.pem Adding debian:Certplus_Class_2_Primary_CA.pem Adding debian:Certinomis_-_Root_CA.pem Warning:

Bug#889640: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts

tags 820770 - moreinfo tags 820770 + wontfix tags 889640 + wontfix forcemerge 820770 889640 thanks Hi Ron, > I chatted with Felipe on IRC, and lintian is still right :) So feel free > to close/merge this one now too. Thanks for following up. Hopefully I've got the control@ incantation right

[lintian] 01/01: checks/patch-systems.pm: Drop surrounding parens so that we leak $1 correctly and appease perltidy.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 4b29e24735a812a27acb923548de816296b395c2 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 08:07:25 2018 + checks/patch-systems.pm: Drop

[lintian] branch master updated (71aa2a4 -> 4b29e24)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 71aa2a4 spelling: Add another correction new 4b29e24 checks/patch-systems.pm: Drop surrounding parens so that we leak $1 correctly and appease

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #186

See Changes: [lamby] Whoops, override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_PROFILES was -- [...truncated 246.27 KB...] Adding

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2577

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #597

See

[lintian] branch master updated (4b29e24 -> f0c2a8a)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 4b29e24 checks/patch-systems.pm: Drop surrounding parens so that we leak $1 correctly and appease perltidy. new f0c2a8a

[lintian] 01/01: checks/changelog-file.desc: Update text for epoch-change-without-comment, making it much clearer for skim-readers to not use epochs for reverts.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit f0c2a8a95fa95d581e9d35a045e0316d9d32dca7 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 08:45:56 2018 + checks/changelog-file.desc: Update

[lintian] branch master updated (f0c2a8a -> 25fad35)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from f0c2a8a checks/changelog-file.desc: Update text for epoch-change-without-comment, making it much clearer for skim-readers to not use epochs for

[lintian] 01/01: Add a classification tag for the control tarball compression format. (Closes: #889856)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 25fad35f5cf2a031c081a096cb0a3f2afa10ed55 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Thu Feb 8 14:20:54 2018 + Add a classification tag for the

Bug#889856: lintian: please add a new control-tarball-compression-format classification tag

tags 889856 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=25fad35f5cf2a031c081a096cb0a3f2afa10ed55 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: lintian: please add a new control-tarball-compression-format classification tag

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 889856 + pending Bug #889856 [lintian] lintian: please add a new control-tarball-compression-format classification tag Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #889856 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#858588: lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units

Hi Lucas, > I could even argue that the above tag is misnamed, and should be e.g. > systemd-no-service-file-for-init-script-but-other-init-scripts-have- > service-file Oh wow. Indeed, this is actually quite badly misnamed which probably led to much of my confusion here. :) How about we simply

Bug#858588: lintian: Classification tag for missing systemd units

On 08/02/18 at 20:05 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > > I could even argue that the above tag is misnamed, and should be e.g. > > systemd-no-service-file-for-init-script-but-other-init-scripts-have- > > service-file > > Oh wow. Indeed, this is actually quite badly misnamed which

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #182

See Changes: [lamby] Add a classification tag for the control tarball compression format. -- [...truncated 246.17 KB...] Adding