Bug#854209: Interest in a patch

2023-01-26 Thread Soren Stoutner
Would you be interested in a patch to fix the false positives in this Lintian check? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1024361: lintian: complains about bpo version when package built with salsa-CI/pipeline (+salsaci)

2023-01-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1024361 Control: found -1 2.116.0 salsa has worked around your fix ;-) https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/commit/b0d375957e4a24cd67675baaecfcc79b45549fff changed the suffix from +salsaci to +salsaci+${DATESTAMP}+${CI_PIPELINE_IID} e.g.

Processed: Re: lintian: complains about bpo version when package built with salsa-CI/pipeline (+salsaci)

2023-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 2.116.0 Bug #1024361 {Done: Axel Beckert } [lintian] lintian: complains about bpo version when package built with salsa-CI/pipeline (+salsaci) Marked as found in versions lintian/2.116.0; no longer marked as fixed in versions lintian/2.116.0 and reopened.