Collin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All that said, while I can think of valid examples where a program is in
bin with a man page in section 8, I can't think of any valid examples
where a program is in sbin with a man page in section 1. I think a check
for the latter would probably be
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in order to get rid of this patch in ubuntu, please include it in the
next lintian upload. Attached the patch we have in ubuntus lintian.
That doesn't seem right. We can assume that someone packaging on a
Debian system (i.e. running lintian from Debian)
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.15
Severity: normal
The following lintian error occured during the testing of a package I
am preparing:
E: firefox-greasemonkey: symlink-should-be-absolute
usr/lib/firefox/extensions/{e4a8a97b-f2ed-450b-b12d-ee082ba24781}
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in order to get rid of this patch in ubuntu, please include it in the
next lintian upload. Attached the patch we have in ubuntus lintian.
That doesn't seem right. We can assume that someone packaging on a
Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:21:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350114: Please add ubuntu upload targets to
frontend/lintian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
5 matches
Mail list logo
