Processed: Re: Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 462586 -1 Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes Bug 462586 cloned as bug 462589. reassign -1 debian-policy Bug#462589: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only

lintian: r1147 - in trunk: checks debian testset testset/binary/debian

Author: rra Date: 2008-01-26 02:37:23 +0100 (Sat, 26 Jan 2008) New Revision: 1147 Modified: trunk/checks/menu-format trunk/debian/changelog trunk/testset/binary/debian/hello.desktop trunk/testset/tags.binary Log: + [RA] Fix a bug that prevented Exec keys in desktop files from being

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r1147

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r1147 by rra tag 462601 + pending Bug#462601: lintian: su-wrapper-not-su-to-root doesn't catch all the desktop files using non su-to-root wrappers There were no tags set. Tags added:

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r1148

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r1148 by rra tag 462586 + pending Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks

lintian: r1148 - in trunk: debian frontend

Author: rra Date: 2008-01-26 02:41:50 +0100 (Sat, 26 Jan 2008) New Revision: 1148 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/frontend/lintian Log: + [RA] Don't require *.changes files for source-only uploads to have a Description field. Thanks, Cyril Brulebois. (Closes: #462586)

Bug#462601: lintian: su-wrapper-not-su-to-root doesn't catch all the desktop files using non su-to-root wrappers

Package: lintian Version: 1.23.42 Hello, After running an archive-wide lintian check I've noticed some packages aren't being detected by the newly introduced su-wrapper-not-su-to-root check/tag. A simple way to detect some of the missing ones is by checking the list of reports[1] I've filled

Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

Package: lintian Version: 1.23.42 Severity: wishlist Hi, since dpkg-dev is moving quite quickly these days, I postponed its upgrade, and only hit today the following: | E: graphviz_2.16.1-1_source.changes: no-description-in-changes-file Since dpkg/1.14.16, we have: | * Some code refactoring on

Bug#462456: lintian: Please consider testing if files in -dbg packages retain Dynamic Section entries

[ joeyh: it looks like you missed /emul in the dh_shlibdeps list, so CCing #461339. ] On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:33:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.42 Severity: wishlist See #462007 - I have come across a

Bug#451668: Reply not resent to maintainer

Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A few days ago I replied[1] to a lintian bug that was already closed (#451668). For some reason the message wasn't sent to the maintainer, or at least it doesn't appear in the mailing list archive[2]. Yeah, the mailing list seemed to lose a bunch of mail

Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

clone 462586 -1 reassign -1 debian-policy retitle -1 Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for source-only *.changes files severity -1 normal thanks Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.42 Severity: wishlist since dpkg-dev is