On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hm, yes, that's a problem. I think I slightly prefer [4] in that case,
but another possible change to [3] would be to just add the E/W/I in that
case without any additional text (meaning probably text of just nbsp;).
It would look
Jordà Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right. I also think it is more accurate - and leaving the E/W/I without
the extra info looks really weird. So welcome v12[1][2][3].
1. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v12/index.html
2. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v12/full/unsorted.html
3.
Author: rra
Date: 2008-04-29 02:52:38 +0200 (Tue, 29 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1285
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
+ [RA] If the call to some supporting program like update-inetd is
conditional on the existence of the program, assume the maintainer
knows
3 matches
Mail list logo
