Hi,
This is the first of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
Hopefully all the patches are self-explanatory, but please let me know
if there are any questions or issues.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
This is the second of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
This patch assumes (due to the context included in the diff) that the
previous patch has already been applied.
Hopefully all
Hi,
This is the fourth of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
It's possible that some hunks of this patch may fail to apply as-is due
to conflicts with earlier patches; if this turns out to
In einen Gewerbebetrieb zu arbeiten waere Ihnen interessant?
Sie besitzen einige Internetkenntnisse?
Bei [EMAIL PROTECTED] melden und sich interessieren lassen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^ Adobe CS3 Master Collection for PC or MAC includes:
^ InDesign CS3
^ Photoshop CS3
^ Illustrator CS3
^ Acrobat 8 Professional
^ Flash CS3 Professional
^ Dreamweaver CS3
^ Fireworks CS3
^ Contribute CS3
^ After Effects CS3 Professional
^ Premiere Pro CS3
^ Encore DVD CS3
^ Soundbooth CS3
^
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This is the first of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
Hopefully all the patches are self-explanatory, but please let me
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
@@ -615,6 +631,7 @@
# We've checked for all the things we still want to notice in
# double-quoted strings, so now remove those strings as well.
+ $cat_line =~
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ last if (++$i 55);
+ if
(/(^\s*|\beval\s*[\'\]|(;|)\s*)exec\s*.+\s*.?\$$var.?\s*(--\s*)?.?(\${1:?\+.?)?(\$(\@|\*))?/)
{
I guess that regex could really use a little /x treatment.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
--- checks/scripts.orig 2008-06-13 14:51:32.0 +0100
+++ checks/scripts2008-06-13 15:00:57.0 +0100
@@ -542,6 +542,11 @@
if ($cat_string eq and $checkbashisms and
!$within_another_shell) {
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 04:58:02AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This is the first of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few
10 matches
Mail list logo
