Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 621667 623310
Bug#621667: lintian: update for Policy 3.9.2.0 needed
Bug#623310: lintian: newer-standards-version reports older policy than what is
current
Forcibly Merged 621667 623310.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc2
Severity: minor
Whiel making Debian package and running lintian I see:
W: winetricks source: newer-standards-version 3.9.2 (current is 3.9.1)
But, the latest 3.9.2 is installed:
$ apt-cache policy debian-policy
debian-policy:
Installed:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit c5880b0fadd3fed72adf9f91f1032bc89c6596c4
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue Apr 19 14:09:50 2011 +0200
Throw away info objects when checks are done
This avoids memory being used by info-caches that
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 7e3e4fafa130ee7ea0c1445491aedf21c935a9e7
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue Apr 19 14:15:05 2011 +0200
Fixed test failure with d/changelog
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index
On 13/02/11 02:27, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi there.
On Feb 11 2011, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
I'll draft over the next few days.
Nicolas, do you have anything written already? I'm not sure if the best
thing would be to have it on a repository or on a Wiki.
Hi Rogério and other fellow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Considering that #513663 will be closed in 2.5.0~rc3, I figured it was
time to start a new branch. XD
I was considering to do either Vendor-based customization or support
third party checks (e.g. Lintian extra), as the subject suggests I
think
Hi, Nicolas.
Thanks for the reply.
On Apr 19 2011, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
On 13/02/11 02:27, Rogério Brito wrote:
Nicolas, do you have anything written already? I'm not sure if the best
thing would be to have it on a repository or on a Wiki.
Hi Rogério and other fellow pkg-fonts team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi (again for some)
I realised after sending my proposal that it would probably be a good
idea to (ab)use the d-derivatives list to get more opinions on this
proposal (quoted in full below).
I have set Reply-To to lintian-maint@d.o as I would
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:04:47 +0200
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
[Needed]
* No code changes:
- It must be possible to alter whether Lintian emits a tag without
modifying code.
* Re-usable:
- Most profiles will likely be based on the core profile. New
2011/4/9 Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com:
Hi lintian team.
Ruby packaging is changing (see
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy).
When checking my dsc file lintian return a warning:
ruby-globalhotkeys source: unknown-field-in-dsc ruby-versions
In d/control I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-19 20:23, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:04:47 +0200
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
[Needed]
* No code changes:
- It must be possible to alter whether Lintian emits a tag without
modifying code.
*
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:02:27 +0200
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
Emdebian tried this and came up against a few hidden assumptions in
lintian which we discussed with the lintian maintainers at the time. We
experimented with an emdebian checks file and desc file:
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
On 2011-04-19 20:32, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2011/4/9 Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com:
Hi lintian team.
Ruby packaging is changing (see
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy).
When checking my dsc file lintian return a warning:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 5179c8040fca90825dd9397ce201a524cbd5b3d9
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue Apr 19 21:57:51 2011 +0200
Revert Fixed test failure with d/changelog
This reverts commit
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ab6c18ad620ad9c8f6129d603a5c89556f8b827d
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue Apr 19 22:00:18 2011 +0200
Revert Revert Fixed test failure with d/changelog
This reverts commit
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 0cd4f455b7bfb754f372472b20b94b0c94bbe3da
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Tue Apr 19 22:00:46 2011 +0200
Revert Added breaks on emdebian-crush and xdeb due to unpack removal
This reverts commit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
submitter 623390 vinc4...@gmail.com
Bug #623390 [lintian] lintian: Please add Ruby-Versions to known binary/dsc
fields
Changed Bug submitter to 'vinc4...@gmail.com' from 'Niels Thykier
ni...@thykier.net'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Considering that #513663 will be closed in 2.5.0~rc3, I figured it was
time to start a new branch. XD
w00t!
I was considering to do either Vendor-based customization or
Hi Niels,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
I thought I would bring a little update on the progress on Lintian
2.5.0~rc3. I have CC'ed Steve Langasek and Vincent Fourmond because I
last I heard from you, you were working on patches for bugs I am
considering for
19 matches
Mail list logo
