Bug#913930: lintian: Potentially false-positive public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc

2018-11-18 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le 19 novembre 2018 00:56:42 GMT+01:00, Felix Lechner a écrit : >Hi Pierre-Elliott, > >Looks like the call to 'gpg --list-packets' failed, but I cannot >reproduce the issue. Your report mentioned lintian 2.5.112~bpo9+1 and >stable, while the build log was for lintian 2.5.112 on experimental.

Bug#913930: lintian: Potentially false-positive public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc

2018-11-18 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Pierre-Elliott, Looks like the call to 'gpg --list-packets' failed, but I cannot reproduce the issue. Your report mentioned lintian 2.5.112~bpo9+1 and stable, while the build log was for lintian 2.5.112 on experimental. With which release are you working, please? Thank you! Kind regards,

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #3424

2018-11-18 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [lamby] Unify all dpkg internal database checks into a single new -- [...truncated 242.56 KB...] Adding debian:Network_Solutions_Certificate_Authority.pem

Bug#913930: lintian: Potentially false-positive public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc

2018-11-18 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 913930 + moreinfo thanks Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > lxc source: public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc cannot > be processed Felix, any insight here? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: Bug#913930: lintian: Potentially false-positive public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 913930 + moreinfo Bug #913930 [lintian] lintian: Potentially false-positive public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#913974: lintian: warn against direct access to the dpkg database from upstream code

2018-11-18 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 913974 + pending thanks Hi Guillem, > to emit tags, as the bulk of the offending accesses are being > done from upstream code. I somehow missed this bit in your followup; sorry about that. Anyway this is now implemented in Git, pending upload:

Processed: Re: lintian: warn against direct access to the dpkg database from upstream code

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 913974 + pending Bug #913974 [lintian] lintian: warn against direct access to the dpkg database from upstream code Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 913974:

Bug#913723: please confirm that dictionaries should move to section localization

2018-11-18 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 913723 - pending thanks Dear Guillem, > > Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical > > conversation here for what was almost-certainly just a slight typo > > or misstep on the behalf of the aforementioned bug submitter. > > See my other reply. This was certainly neither

Processed: Re: Bug#913723: please confirm that dictionaries should move to section localization

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 913723 - pending Bug #913723 [lintian] please confirm that dictionaries should move to section localization Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 913723: