Hi.
I think we should make a lintian upload soon because of the menu
changes. I don't have any time the next days to work on more changes
so unless someone from you has further wishes for the next release
I will prepare one soon.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
various patches.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
. Of course, I do not know whether Frank Lichtenheld is
agreeing to be added, and what his opinion on this is, so that needs to
be cleared up too.
I'm ok with it. I was getting back from the holidays today and will
try to catch up with the lintian changes in the next days. After that
I still
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:02:22PM +0200, Aidas Kasparas wrote:
There could be a space between ] and ; therefore patch should read
Hmm, perhaps we should strip out *all* whitespace and then use the
regexes...
Just thinking loud.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
the
remove. This test has other problems as well, I will try to make a
better one.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
.
Section 11.5 deals with local URLs; the message should refer to
section 10.5.
This is already fixed in 1.22.11 which is ready for upload and should be
available soon.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
merge 235356 234978
thanks
Same forwarded mail, same title, same bug. But yeah, I know, you don't check
for duplicates anyway...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
for server
(http://svn.wolffelaar.nl)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
in a stanza? The Debconf
specification does not enforce this. But perhaps this is true
none-the-less. As you have seen a lot more templates than me, what's
your opinion? ;)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
tags #203389 patch
thanks
I have actually a patch for this but I'm not so confident that he is
good. Perhaps someone can check it?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--- lintian-1.22.9/checks/manpages 2003-01-11 14:48:47.0 +0100
+++ lintian
tags 229460 = confirmed
thanks
debhelper is indeed doing the right thing here as he just uses the
example code from the menu manual. Seems that the recommended behaviour
has changed since this test was written.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
the real cause for the
error).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
check the encoding of the changelog file, but only if
it's UTF-8. I'd word this as check that encoding of changelog file is
UTF-8 instead.
changed, thx for the suggestion
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
it. But I have not the rights to do it and I
also didn't bugged Joy about it. That's all. It will happen...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
in this regard IMHO.
I think the thought behind this is that _we_ should decide if it is
a override case. Otherwise people will just add an override file
for false-positives and do not report them to us even if they are
really bugs on our side.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www
check things ;). Attached is a review, mostly FIXME
statements and a few simple bug fixes.
A good start but needs further work.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--- /home/djpig/fields Sun Mar 28 01:54:46 2004
+++ fields.new Sun Mar 28 01:54:07 2004
Package: lintian
Version: 1.22.12~rc1-r100
Severity: minor
calling suidperl directly seems to be deprecated, see #240728.
Someone has to investigate this and then change checks/scripts
accordingly, probably me ;)
Gruesse,
Frank
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture:
/relations contains
such a case and NO error is issued about it. So I really don't believe
it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
then be shared between packages.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
that it will produce false positives. The only question is, how many.
Will try to find that out...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
overrides, but since the
entries miss the source they would be ignored anyway.
Proof-of-concept (i.e. untested) patch attached. Comments welcome.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Index: collection/override-file
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:01:22AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:35:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
* checks/fields:
+ [HE] Reintroduce build-depends-without-arch-dep check with the patch
i
and not just one in the checks.
Otherwise it looks good.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
in Lintian SVN.
Thx and Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
that %pkgs stuff
yet, can you look into it?
fixed. One shouldn't assume a too strong naming scheme for source files
;)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
between doesn't depend and doesn't depend on same
version
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
to put jade in the build deps?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:29:30AM +0100, Dafydd Harries wrote:
Lintian warns about #!/usr/bin/ruby1.8 being an unusual interpreter.
Attached is a patch for Lintian that fixes that.
Fixed in SVN. I extended your patch a bit. Attached the full patch
for reference.
Gruesse,
--
Frank
?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Index: checks/common_data.pm
===
--- checks/common_data.pm (revision 285)
+++ checks/common_data.pm (working copy)
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@
%known_archs
);
for my $re (@bashism_regexs) {
And we need an common RE before the commands to try to guess if they are
really commands.
Will look further into it, thanks for the patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 09:27:50AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
lintian should check for use of fgrep or egrep in scripts and suggest
the use grep -F or grep -E instead.
What is the rationale behind this? Could you please explain that
further?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www
take a neutral position
here until this is decided some time.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
/') == 0
+ spawn('cp', '-Lrp', unpacked/debian/$file, 'debfiles/') == 0
or fail(cannot copy unpacked/debian/$file: $!);
}
closedir(DEBIAN);
Has this approach any disadvantages or should I commit this patch?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
/Tsource-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number.html
4.)
lintian is not lintian clean?
http://people.debian.org/~djpig/lintian.d.o/reports/mDebian_Lintian_Maintainers.html
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 06:59:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:01:13AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
The following (mostly minor) problems have been found during a
lintian test run over the archive but I haven't had time yet to
investigate them
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 06:48:59PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:23:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Beside some bugs I've already fixed in the Beta, there are some points
I found where we should discuss if they are bugs:
1) we have now a check
, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
The check of the fireflier source package fails because the debian/changelog
file is a symlink to ../changelog. I propose to solve this issue by
dereferencing all symlinks during the collection of the debian/ files.
Patch:
Index: collection/debfiles
against and I'm doing the same. Let's do that in 1.23.2
and hope the whole issue has settled until then.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
: aspseek-cgi: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/cgi-bin/s.cgi
/usr/lib/aspseek
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
=~ m/\bcurrent ar archive\b/);
Since I can't think of any clean solution right now, I file it as bug.
It affects only this package AFAICS (- minor)
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux djpig 2.4.18-1-k7 #1 Wed Apr 14 19:20
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.1~beta-r304
Severity: minor
wrong-path-for-XXX can be issued for all keys of the hash %valid_interpreters.
There are some interpreters that are missing a entry in scripts.desc however.
Especially for interpreters like python only exists a description for
an upgrade to the newest sed the problem
vanished. I simply don't know for sure which sed upgrade fixed it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
djpigdjpig 4 Jul 13 19:58 testfile
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
sed-test.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
be able to emulate this behaviour by only running
dpkg-source -b and then calling lintian on the resulting source
package.
Interesting idea, though. Let's see what we can do :)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
check if a package has lintian warnings or errors,
it just computes the link. So if fetchyahoo has indeed no lintian
errors and warnings (didn't check yet) this is the expected behavior.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
and applied the
corrections mentioned in the bug report by Jeroen and Denis.
Attached the final patch. If noone has any objections against adding the
additional depends on intltool-debian I will go ahead and commit it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
systematic behind this, just
sick of testing the same thing three or for times in one
testcase...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:23:26AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
For the regular expression I would expect '\d\.\d' ( digit, literal
point, digit )
Indeed, thx for noting this.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
it in the BTS.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
We held a short meeting about what we plan for the further lintian
development (Version 2.0). Here the minutes:
(these are solely my perception of the meeting, HE and jvw might
want to add/correct some points)
Minutes of the Lintian IRC meeting
Attendees:
- Frank Lichtenheld 'djpig'
- Marc
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:27:31PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hmm, it might be good to add a little explanation to the
description of the tag what the maintainer is supposed to
do about this? If I would encounter this I
not sure what I had when I proposed the test, I might have been
in en_AU which is latin-1.)
I've used the patch by Denis for now.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
them to check the package. Perhaps lintian should?
I'm not really sure we should this. After all, is there anything out
there that actually _uses_ that information if it is available?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
]:~/debian/tmp$ cat 1
test
2
2 is interpreted as an option to the program here an 1 redirects both
output file descriptors to the file 1 !
See also section 2.7.6 of POSIX for reference...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
a few days after
the release (i.e. very soon now)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
probably be raised to E:
Nah, they are in the categorie Minor issues, I don't think that
qualifies...
Unless one of my co-maintainers objects I will close this bug.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
submittal was
refused for upload until extra # dh_* lines were removed.
Hrm, and this was the only reason it was rejected?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
The slides of my lintian talk here at Debian QA Meeting in Darmstadt
are available on my website
http://www.djpig.de/projekte/debian/talks/lintian/lintian.pdf
http://www.djpig.de/projekte/debian/talks/lintian/lintian.html
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
...
the *-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig could be avoided as well.
Will look into it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/lib/.*\.ali$, $operm != 0444) {
tag bad-permissions-for-ali-file, $file;
}
So which package was the problem with and which permisions do the
files have?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
checks/po-debconf
stops before running its own checks, which makes checks/po-debconf
pretty useless.
Indeed. I see no simple solution that supports both purposes, though.
Will try to come up with something but any suggestions welcome...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.12
Severity: normal
since debconf in woody was 1.0.32 we can probably delete the following checks:
seen-flag-requires-versioned-depends (debconf = 0.5)
multiselect-without-dependency (debconf = 0.2.26)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
actually do something about it...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
this one I would really prefer if you commit them yourself...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
line
No opintion on that yet. I thought we already checked for that but can
find no evidence for that.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to debconf-devel(7).
Indeed. As a matter of fact this is already fixed in the SVN version,
but there didn't exist a bug report about it :)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
?
This is a bug in dpkg-checkbuilddeps, I believe. Policy allows whitespace
Yeah. If dpkg-dev really would mishandle that (which I can't reproduce)
that would be a serious bug IMHO. Please report it there.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.5 for details.
GPLv3 is not yet in /usr/share/common-licenses, so it's not possible to refer
to it this way.
It is (for about a week now).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:17:57PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
It would be nice if lintian would complain about improper or missing
dependencies for -data packages
think it means. Please read the
explanation.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
act on sexual fantasies. When people google my name, Everett Hutton,
this site is at the top of the search engine, and is destroying my name and
reputation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the address you may want to contact.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
in
that religious war :-)
I'm also more on the tab side of this argument although I have to
confess I normally use the default emacs indentation which is a mixture
of tabs and spaces. As long as it is documented feel free to use
whatever you like for new code.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
at position 873
So something is dubious with this file...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
($libc_filename, $libc_package);
+for (keys %NEEDED) {
+if (/^libc\.so\.(\d+.*)/) {
+$libc_package = libc$1 | libc${1}-i386;
Hmm, that seems to be very amd64 specific. What about all the
other libc variants?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
Out of curiosity, what is this one for?
.hgignore | 29
.hgtags | 10
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
.
- This file is generally useless in an installed package and was probably
- installed by accident.
-
Tag: arch-inventory-file-in-package
Type: warning
Info: Package contains a '.arch-inventory' file. It may have been
Opinions and comments welcome.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED
-standard-architecture ppc64
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:11:16AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
A fix for .hgignore was commited by Frank Lichtenheld:
Note that the bug was about source packages. So my fix didn't
directly addressed this bug. OTOH the bug as such for source
packages is probably wontfix, since we stopped to issue
the
date of publication of the standards.
I really fail to see the difference.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/.
To be exact everything is allowed that gets transformed by cpp into a
valid list file. So we can either run it through cpp ourself (but
with which architecture defines?) or define a subset of features we
will accept.
overkill^2
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
reasonable. It should probably only suppress out-of-date and
not ancient.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
The length of the changelog entry gives me the impression that lintian
might be ready for the next upload. Any objections?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
set against the
current lintian svn is the easiest for me. But it's also easy for me to
apply a set of patches, so don't go to any extra work.
Easiest would probably be to just give Adam commit rights and let him do
the whole work ;)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
to
metapackage. Thanks, Frank S. Thomas. (Closes: #476681)
Note that this changelog entry will itself trigger the warning:
W: lintian: spelling-error-in-changelog meta package metapackage
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
found in the extended description should be
a homepage) is really a good idea.
I personally would vote for closing this bug.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
format has been adopted very widely outside of
a few scattered groups, so we're basically adding an I: tag for almost the
entire archive.
Yeah, I would leave that out, too.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.= : $!\n;
} else {
$str .= .\n;
}
$! = 2; # set return code outside eval()
die $str;
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
dput was fixed in January 2008 and for dupload a NMU (by me) is in the
DELAYED queue. So I guess we can queue the fix for this bug for the next
upload.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
change any
maintainer scripts, so it doesn't belong in this list.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
There are already checks for overly long lines in changelogs and
the Description field (i.e. control).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
policy-compliant sh interpreter here).
I agree.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to me. Unless any of the other maintainers have any
remaining issues, I plan on integrating this patch the next time I sit
down and do lintian work.
Fine with me. But I don't plan to work on it myself, will leave it to
you.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
since it most cases a newer version
still will be correctly detected.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
# suggestions welcome
tags 477057 help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
# not a false-positive
severity 475400 minor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
