or if you don't want to have to run a test program (e.g. if you support
cross compiling) maybe you can try to build a program that has at least
one function call, do a disassembly on it (objdump -d foo) and see if
get calls to _mcount, which will indicate to profiling is enabled.
So, what
tags 231770 +patch
thanks
Hi
Easy patch included for consideration.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -Nru lintian-1.23.28/checks/scripts lintian-1.23.28.new/checks/scripts
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tags 330025 +patch
thanks
Hi
Easy patch included for consideration.
Thanks! At this point I'm tempted to take this, although I think that
CDBS still uses DH_COMPAT rather than a debian/compat file (but I'm not
positive
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tags 231770 +patch
thanks
Hi
Easy patch included for consideration.
My concern about the simple approach to this (which I never sent to the
bug; my bad) is that the other major use of read besides prompting is for
parsing
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
included?
libgd2-xpm isn't even in oldlibs and there's no hint in the package
description that it shouldn't be used. Is it really being phased out?
The source
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
included?
Do you want me to file a bug to include them or is mentioning them over
here enough?
Could you explain more why that would be? For the first two, do
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
We noticed a yet unreported RC bug in the version of lintian in lenny
(it will fail on purge in most cases) and we would like to fix this
through t-p-u as we already have a new version in unstable.
I've included a second fix which removes a tag which annoyed many
Signed-off-by: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
---
checks/fields |6 ++
checks/fields.desc |6 ++
debian/changelog |3 +++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/checks/fields b/checks/fields
index 4435f66..b23760c 100644
--- a/checks/fields
+++ b
Signed-off-by: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
---
checks/rules |5 +
checks/rules.desc |7 +++
debian/changelog |3 +++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/checks/rules b/checks/rules
index 2ac1d3f..0b8a5f9 100644
--- a/checks/rules
+++ b/checks
I don't think this really belongs to the lintian package, but the web
site directed me here.
The tag manpage-has-errors-from-man has some false positives on
lintian.debian.org because the tests have not been run with the current
version of man-db. In particular, the 'errors from man' listed
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.1
Severity: important
Hi
udpkg (the dpkg equivalent within d-i) does only support gziped tarballs. So it
does not support data.tar.bz2 and similar.
It would be good if there could be an autoreject for these to avoid broken
daily/weekly images and uninstallable
Hi Lintian Maintainers
Is yada added to the obsolete packages? The package is orphaned and
should probably be removed. So it would be good if it would also be
added to the obsolete packages within lintian.
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Lintian ERROR saying dpatch is
12 matches
Mail list logo