Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:35 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Maybe that code should be moved to Alioth at some point... I did notice that there was an Alioth

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks. Yet another reason to move learn at least basic git-fu up the to-do list. It's like someone's trying to tell me something... :) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html might help. It's what I wrote as part of learning it myself. --

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Have you generated an account at

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Have you generated an account at

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:44:23PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe that code should be moved to Alioth at some point... Until Jeroen shows some sign of life please send patches again. I wouldn't mind migrating Lintian to Git, for that matter,

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Have you generated an account at http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/ ? I've tried, a few times, but it appears

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:00:48AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] I had time, but unfortunately not the magic commit bit :-/ I've been forming a list of patches in my head (which I should probably write down before I forget any :-)

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:00:48AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 20:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Easiest would probably be to just give Adam commit rights and let

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 20:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Easiest would probably be to just give Adam commit rights and let him do the whole work ;) That would also work. :) I'd be

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-05-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: At the moment, I haven't had a chance to apply any of your patches, so if it's the same amount of work for you, a unified patch

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There have been several further changes to checkbashisms in the past month, most of which should be suitable for merging in to lintian. Please let me know whether you'd prefer incremental patches once those from my earlier message have been applied,

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Russ Allbery wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There have been several further changes to checkbashisms in the past month, most of which should be suitable for merging in to lintian. Please let me know whether you'd prefer incremental patches once those from my earlier message

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: At the moment, I haven't had a chance to apply any of your patches, so if it's the same amount of work for you, a unified patch set against the current lintian svn is the easiest for me.

Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-04-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There have been several further changes to checkbashisms in the past month, most of which should be suitable for merging in to lintian. Please let me know whether you'd prefer

[checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update

2008-03-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, I've attached a few patches against current lintian SVN which update checks/scripts to incorporate some changes that have been made to checkbashisms recently (there are a few changes I've not included such as ignoring multi-line quoted text and checking for invalid function names, as I'd like