Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Package: lintian Version: 2.1.1~bpo40+1 Severity: important Hi lintian had a nice --color html which we ftpmaster used. Now in 2.1.1 thats gone. Please put it back. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, lintian had a nice --color html which we ftpmaster used. Now in 2.1.1 thats gone. Please put it back. Thanks. HTML colour output was dropped in 2.1.0 as part of the reorganisation of Lintian's output methods. I assume no-one had realised that it was in active use. :-/ Reintroducing it

Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HTML colour output was dropped in 2.1.0 as part of the reorganisation of Lintian's output methods. I assume no-one had realised that it was in active use. :-/ Ack, I knew it was in active use, but I must have missed that message. Reintroducing it

Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:56 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HTML colour output was dropped in 2.1.0 as part of the reorganisation of Lintian's output methods. I assume no-one had realised that it was in active use. :-/ Ack, I knew it was in active

Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:56 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reintroducing it shouldn't be a problem, although I'm debating whether that should be directly (by readding the original option) or as

Bug#508341: lintian: Dropped html color output

2008-12-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
I'd rather we put back the original option. We shouldn't make users use a different option, and that output format wasn't experimental. It was intended to be a regularly supported option. Okay, I'll go with that then. Thanks. I've re-added (and committed) support for the original