Bug#891688: lintian: warn about missing Vcs-Browser field when Vcs-* mention hosts with browsable archives

Hi Paul, > It is my fault for not mentioning this in the initial mail but some of > those regexen are bogus and also all the dots should be escaped. No problem. Updated here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=a9bd3494f20e4f63b17c86accb7a262becc47e63 Best wishes,

Bug#891688: lintian: warn about missing Vcs-Browser field when Vcs-* mention hosts with browsable archives

On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:17:27 + Chris Lamb wrote: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=5987bf72b658df48004d3cfaefc4774ee670abd4 It is my fault for not mentioning this in the initial mail but some of those regexen are bogus and also all the dots should be

Bug#891688: lintian: warn about missing Vcs-Browser field when Vcs-* mention hosts with browsable archives

tags 891688 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=5987bf72b658df48004d3cfaefc4774ee670abd4 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#891688: lintian: warn about missing Vcs-Browser field when Vcs-* mention hosts with browsable archives

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.76 Severity: wishlist Some packages have a Vcs-* field but no Vcs-Browser field and are using hosting services that support browsing the VCS tree and history. An example of a package that should trigger this complaint is debsecan. I would suggest that it be info