On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:42:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On January 21, 2019 8:48:35 AM PST, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >Hi Matthias,
> >
> >> [...] I think I'll enable that by default in GCC 9 for bullseye.
> >
> >Cool. I think that therefore asking Developers to add it manually
> >via Lintian
Hi Josh,
> I think there'd still be value in catching binaries that still end up
> with unused dependencies for some reason, but making --as-needed the
> default will certainly reduce the incidence of such issues.
Getcha. Let's therefore revisit this after it becomes the default. :)
Regards,
On January 21, 2019 8:48:35 AM PST, Chris Lamb wrote:
>Hi Matthias,
>
>> [...] I think I'll enable that by default in GCC 9 for bullseye.
>
>Cool. I think that therefore asking Developers to add it manually
>via Lintian would therefore not be ideal - what do you think?
I think there'd still be
Hi Matthias,
> [...] I think I'll enable that by default in GCC 9 for bullseye.
Cool. I think that therefore asking Developers to add it manually
via Lintian would therefore not be ideal - what do you think?
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
On 21.01.19 16:37, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [Adding d...@debian.org to CC]
>
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>>> This does not sound like a good idea to me, since fixing such warnings
>>> would result in many ugly (and sometimes not upstreamable) hacks.
>>
>> In most cases, fixing such warnings would
[ Josh: The BTS does not Cc submitter or commenters, so I didn't get
your email. ]
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:37:02PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [Adding d...@debian.org to CC]
>
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > > This does not sound like a good idea to me, since fixing such warnings
> > >
[Adding d...@debian.org to CC]
Josh Triplett wrote:
> > This does not sound like a good idea to me, since fixing such warnings
> > would result in many ugly (and sometimes not upstreamable) hacks.
>
> In most cases, fixing such warnings would involve either adding
> --as-needed or just
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:39:27 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 03:45:35PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I'd love to see lintian catch issues like this:
> >
> > $ ldd -u /sbin/badblocks
> > Unused direct dependencies:
> > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libblkid.so.1
> >
> > Lintian
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 03:45:35PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.122
> Severity: normal
>
> I'd love to see lintian catch issues like this:
>
> $ ldd -u /sbin/badblocks
> Unused direct dependencies:
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libblkid.so.1
>
> Lintian already
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.122
Severity: normal
I'd love to see lintian catch issues like this:
$ ldd -u /sbin/badblocks
Unused direct dependencies:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libblkid.so.1
Lintian already parses binaries and libraries with objdump, so catching
this seems reasonable.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
