Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Will adjust it to just emit the tag when a version was set.
Done.
--- a/checks/watch-file.desc
+++ b/checks/watch-file.desc
@@ -77,3 +77,8 @@ Info: The watch file seems to be passing arguments to the
redirector
other
Hi all,
Attached is a patch adding a check for empty watch files.
This tag has been added because of situations like #489050.
The patch also removes a lax attempt of handling line continuations and
improves the one I added a couple of days ago.
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is a patch adding a check for empty watch files.
This tag has been added because of situations like #489050.
The patch also removes a lax attempt of handling line continuations and
improves the one I added a couple of days ago.
What's the
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:09 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
What's the correct way for a non-native Debian package to indicate that
there's no useful upstream and watch file processing should not be done
for that package?
I'd been assuming that it was adding a watch file that contained only
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Attached is a patch adding a check for empty watch files.
This tag has been added because of situations like #489050.
The patch also removes a lax attempt of handling line continuations and
improves the one I added a couple
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Will adjust it to just emit the tag when a version was set.
Done.
Cheers,
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
diff --git a/checks/watch-file
6 matches
Mail list logo
