On Thursday 03 January 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm not sure what to do with these, since they really are extra copies of
the licenses without any useful change (unlike the *.html versions):
W: kdelibs-data: extra-license-file
usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common/fdl-license W: kdelibs-data:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 3 January 2008 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/
This looks good in general, it's a clear improvement over what we have.
Thanks!
* The HTML pages are now templatized (using Text::Template). The
On to, 2008-01-03 at 08:48 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I was thinking that this could be better implemented by generating one page
per maintainer with all tags, and that I and O are hidden elements by
default. A link on the page would then just toggle the visibility of that CSS
class
On Thu, January 3, 2008 10:00, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
That would mean that it gets harder to get one or the other version of
the page: it's no longer enough to just go to the page, you also have to go
click on something else as well. For something that is a simple report
page, I don't think
Russ Allbery wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 3 January 2008 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/
This looks good in general, it's a clear improvement over what we have.
Thanks!
* The HTML pages are now templatized (using
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:10:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FHS chapter 4, at the end of the paragraph on Specific options in
/usr/share, says:
Similarly, a /usr/lib/games hierarchy may be used in addition to
the /usr/share/games
Package: lintian
lintian/checks/scripts currently lists pike, pike7, and pike7.6 as valid
interpreters, associating them with packages of the same names.
Currently, the available Pike interpreters are /usr/bin/pike7.6, provided by
pike7.6-core, and /usr/bin/pike7.7, provided by pike7.7-core.
tim hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
If you want to take a look at how good (or bad) the templates look, the
ones that generated those pages are in:
/org/lintian.debian.org/lintian-test/reporting/templates
on gluck.d.o.
Not being a DD, I probably can't access this.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
unblock 456318 with 458824
Bug#458824: better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed
Bug#456318: [checks/binaries] allow /usr/lib/games rpath for games binaries
Was
Russ Allbery wrote:
tim hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/lintian/trunk/reporting/templates/
will also work.
Thanks. :)
My current forward thinking on the presentation of reports like this is
to have the script deliver pure XML and do all the
Hi all,
I'm sponsoring ttf-khmeros, which produces a font udeb for d-i. The
latest ttf-khmeros update moved the homepage from the package
description to the new dpkg source package field. As a result, lintian
complains with I: ttf-khmeros-udeb udeb: unknown-field-in-control
homepage. Is this a
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sponsoring ttf-khmeros, which produces a font udeb for d-i. The
latest ttf-khmeros update moved the homepage from the package
description to the new dpkg source package field. As a result, lintian
complains with I: ttf-khmeros-udeb udeb:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:59 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'd check with the d-i team and ask them their opinion. I'm happy to
modify lintian to match if needed.
Thanks for that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 04:47:22 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1103
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/binaries:
+ [RA] Some packages include debugging symbols in the main package, so
don't warn about unstripped binaries in ../lib/debug
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 05:00:11 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1104
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
+ [RA] Allow rpath pointing to /usr/lib/games/package. Thanks, Bas
Wijnen. (Closes: #456318)
Modified: trunk/checks/binaries
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1104 by rra
tag 456318 + pending
Bug#456318: [checks/binaries] allow /usr/lib/games rpath for games binaries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 05:18:28 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1105
Modified:
trunk/checks/menu-format
trunk/checks/menu-format.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.binary
Log:
* checks/menu-format{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Warn about use of su wrappers other than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1105 by rra
tag 453931 + pending
Bug#453931: lintian: Warn when using gksu/kdesu instead of su-to-root
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 05:54:12 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1106
Added:
trunk/testset/foo++/debian/copyright
trunk/testset/scripts/debian/copyright
Modified:
trunk/checks/copyright-file
trunk/checks/copyright-file.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1106 by rra
tag 454238 + pending
Bug#454238: [copyright-file] warn if GPL code links to libssl without an
exception
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 06:08:31 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1107
Modified:
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/fields.desc:
+ [RA] Remove X.X.X versions from the debian-revision-not-well-formed
long description. (Closes: #456286)
+ [RA]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1107 by rra
tag 456286 + pending
Bug#456286: lintian: debian-revision-not-well-formed mentions old binNMU style
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Kobayashi Noritada [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The description for debian-revision-not-well-formed says:
N: The debian version part (the part after the -) should consist of one
N: to three dot-separated parts: one for
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 07:03:51 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1109
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/checks/shared-libs
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
+ [RA] Exclude nsswitch modules from multiple SONAME and package
naming checks.
+ [RA] Exclude nsswitch modules
24 matches
Mail list logo
