Bug#912912: marked as done (lintian: please detect for loops without set -e)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:18:33 +0100 with message-id <20181108181832.gq2...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#912912: lintian: please detect for loops without set -e has caused the Debian Bug report #912912, regarding lintian: please detect for loops without set -e to be marked as

Processed: Re: lintian: autopkgtests fail on !(amd64)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 913099 + pending Bug #913099 [lintian] lintian: autopkgtests fail on !(amd64) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 913099:

Bug#913099: Thank you

Hi, Thank you for sending the patch. We adopted all your changes except for the architecture restriction on 'files-multiarch-foreign-files'. (The issue may not be related to #886163.) Instead, the previous behavior should be restored with this commit:

Processing of lintian_2.5.112_amd64.changes

lintian_2.5.112_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.5.112.dsc lintian_2.5.112.tar.xz lintian_2.5.112_all.deb lintian_2.5.112_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#913099: lintian: autopkgtests fail on !(amd64)

tags 913099 + pending thanks Merged https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/71 into Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/4326d7d416d482bbda7ae550097b2e2ac297d416 debian/changelog | 2 ++

Bug#913078: marked as done (Please warn if PIDFile in a .service unit contains /var/run)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Nov 2018 23:35:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913078: fixed in lintian 2.5.112 has caused the Debian Bug report #913078, regarding Please warn if PIDFile in a .service unit contains /var/run to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#913290: lintian: Incorrectly reports invalid-template-id-in-symbols-file/syntax-error-in-symbols-file for certain symbols files

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.110 Severity: normal Tags: patch 14098d4c65159b651d6c324d04cc9a83c26a592e introduced a regression with these two tags[0][1], as noticed by the libsvn1 package. This was due to no longer re-setting[2] meta_info_seen when encountering a new entry in the symbols file.

Bug#912330: marked as done (lintian: Command 'dpkg-architecture' not found in /usr/local/sbin, [..])

Your message dated Thu, 08 Nov 2018 23:35:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912330: fixed in lintian 2.5.112 has caused the Debian Bug report #912330, regarding lintian: Command 'dpkg-architecture' not found in /usr/local/sbin, [..] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#912292: marked as done (lintian: Update Java bytecode checks for openjdk-11)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Nov 2018 23:35:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912292: fixed in lintian 2.5.112 has caused the Debian Bug report #912292, regarding lintian: Update Java bytecode checks for openjdk-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

lintian_2.5.112_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:29:31 + Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.112 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb

Bug#913280: lintian: please warn about packages including files in /usr/share/hal/ (used by obsolete hal package)

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.111 Severity: wishlist Usertags: obsolete Three packages install files in /usr/share/hal/ but this directory is no longer looked at by any package in Debian since hal was removed in 2014 because it was replaced by udev. I will file bugs on the three affected packages