Bug#913761: marked as done (lintian: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version does not recognize @DEB_EXT@)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913761: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913761, regarding lintian: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version does not recognize @DEB_EXT@ to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#913466: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913466: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913466, regarding lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB to be marked as done. This

Bug#914163: marked as done (lintian: False positive: source-only-upload-to-non-free-without-autobuild on source+binary upload)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#914163: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #914163, regarding lintian: False positive: source-only-upload-to-non-free-without-autobuild on source+binary upload to be marked as done.

Bug#913398: marked as done (lintian: Use of uninitialized value $magic in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/lintian/collection/java-info line 115.)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913398: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913398, regarding lintian: Use of uninitialized value $magic in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/lintian/collection/java-info line 115. to be

Bug#879851: marked as done (lintian: Only trigger package-installs-java-bytecode when number of classes exceeds 20)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#879851: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #879851, regarding lintian: Only trigger package-installs-java-bytecode when number of classes exceeds 20 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#913974: marked as done (lintian: warn against direct access to the dpkg database from upstream code)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913974: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913974, regarding lintian: warn against direct access to the dpkg database from upstream code to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#913290: marked as done (lintian: Incorrectly reports invalid-template-id-in-symbols-file/syntax-error-in-symbols-file for certain symbols files)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913290: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913290, regarding lintian: Incorrectly reports invalid-template-id-in-symbols-file/syntax-error-in-symbols-file for certain symbols files to

Processed: Re: Bug#914271: lintian: Rationale behind hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 914271 - pending Bug #914271 [lintian] lintian: Rationale behind hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version Removed tag(s) pending. > tags 914271 + moreinfo Bug #914271 [lintian] lintian: Rationale behind

Bug#914271: lintian: Rationale behind hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version

tags 914271 - pending tags 914271 + moreinfo forwarded 914271 https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/72 thanks Hi Guillem et al., > > I then suggest two things: I've reverted this below, pending further discussion here:

Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

Package: lintian Version: Severity: normal When checking package octave-geometry, Lintian issues the warning package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file usr/share/octave/packages/geometry-3.0.0/meshes3d/readMesh_off.m It seems that the following regex in file

Bug#914271: lintian: Rationale behind hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Having an explicit check for the symbols stuff would be nice, but I > think it's besides the point. In the same way epochs in upstream > version are problematic, dashes in upstream versions are too IMO. Since a few Policy revisions

Processing of lintian_2.5.113_amd64.changes

lintian_2.5.113_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.5.113.dsc lintian_2.5.113.tar.xz lintian_2.5.113_all.deb lintian_2.5.113_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

lintian_2.5.113_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 22:13:47 + Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.113 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb

Bug#913605: marked as done (lintian: inform about lack of systemd service hardening/security options)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913605: fixed in lintian 2.5.113 has caused the Debian Bug report #913605, regarding lintian: inform about lack of systemd service hardening/security options to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#856128:

Hi, The upstream author of CUPS-PDF recently agreed to publish package signatures for future releases. While I share the sentiment of the reporting party, the specific point regarding CUPS-PDF may be moot. Thank you! Kind regards, Felix Lechner

Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

Version: 2.5.113 Hi, Lintian also doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto in debian/watch and reports a warning for this (see [2]). Thanks, Bertrand [2] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/7kaa/blob/master/debian/watch