Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 17:40:40 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.116~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.116
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
please add check, that files in binary packages do not refer to build
directory. See (#915511) for example.
I believe the following strings should raise warning:
/build/{name}
/build/{name}-{version}
$PWD
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.116
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all"
instead of "any". See #915976 for example.
I believe checking that none of files in package have ELF magic is quite
reliable.
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.5.116_bpo9+1 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.5.116_bpo9+1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Chris Lamb pushed to branch stretch-backports at lintian / lintian
Commits:
203a92c0 by Chris Lamb at 2018-12-03T13:56:13Z
Open new changelog entry for 2.5.116.
- - - - -
ccfb7772 by Felix Lechner at 2018-12-03T21:56:48Z
Do not use a global build stamp for tests in debian/rules. (MR: !80)
lintian_2.5.116~bpo9+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.5.116~bpo9+1.dsc
lintian_2.5.116~bpo9+1.tar.xz
lintian_2.5.116~bpo9+1_all.deb
lintian_2.5.116~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Chris,
> I think your recent commits have introduced a regression in the test
> harness:
I am stumped. If you urgently require the tag functionality (I know
you use it often), please reverse !88 and !82, in that order. I do
have a better fix on the way, however, and would appreciate a day to
tags 916021 + moreinfo
thanks
[Adding rb-gene...@lists.reproducible-builds.org to CC]
> please add check, that files in binary packages do not refer to build
> directory. See (#915511) for example.
This seems like it would have quite the overlap with reproducible
builds in that we are
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 916021 + moreinfo
Bug #916021 [lintian] lintian: Please check for references to build directory
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #916021 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
This is confirmed. I saw it earlier and thought it was fixed. Will be
back shortly.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.116
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer, here is excerpt from cflow.texi (GNU cflow 1.5)
Published by the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA
Copyright @copyright{} 2005, 2010, 2014-2016
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 916021 + moreinfo
Bug #916021 [lintian] lintian: Please check for references to build directory
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
916021:
tags 916023 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Dmitry,
> please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all"
> instead of "any".
Hm, is this not the (experimental):
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files.html
… tag? :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 916023 + moreinfo
Bug #916023 [lintian] lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all"
instead of "any"
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
916023:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.116
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: Felix Lechner
Hi Felix,
I think your recent commits have introduced a regression in the test
harness:
$ debian/rules runtests onlyrun=legacy-maintainer-scripts
running tests
mkdir -p
15 matches
Mail list logo
