Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:18:57 -0300 with message-id <20180222171857.gb8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: lintian: [checks] Add Ruby pkg team checks to lintian has caused the Debian Bug report #722084, regarding lintian: Please add Ruby pkg team checks to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 722084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722084 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: lintian Version: 2.5.17 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear Lintian-Maintainer, we the Debian Ruby Team would like to add some lintian checks for the Ruby packages. Please see attched patch. Acknowledgment of Ruby pkg team: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2013/09/msg00011.html Would you please include that checks into the next release of Lintian? Thanks, Jonas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSK1uhAAoJEPBM7/YBbP/Q/9UQAIIJmBSs8bRylgiBtDIHbTBV fFIx4izdXftexvXgpOf8SnurNGov69+MD20SaCNzVnDyWojh1D290WJYjogsTUnv Xv8o6eNxXecgmJW2QYEXRLVF4LcEycscrKvL7o7g0OrPh4cff2CQvbZkMCsDkXrR 6donOzgOneRVAlAUgi7jtMmY2qUOwW3mwUvqIXPYyHHo22eFzZvSIwyTk3ik8viS ki8YqClfdPioH0S0xq8coBXw5fmc4J7EucNQzD0UjjFflxEQ1HRMw2jSbVyIlrTu np7ZNMhWx1h+idffwSF4nDQr1clb3iE/xKO00HBvI7ghlvsiFVyeeSbAugWfoDp6 qAGuvmAeDoVd/pqSRwxLp8HiWC7kzRqTCxcealX1QcDkaUPnNiEpPekqAfWzq6H6 H3t+xkeNRcsw3HCzg+3xobv7qOlm9NmPPbm3ocb2hVsUVqtulCovdvLuGfoSGkOK mPifkrckWd/YvWteeGPSjmEzbof+4YiCLmLYHgf6jEaquu92sBjJBVMqtynU9zaY saKXVg5Z5mZVbeHbJ4bTGM/GMqR9XQtzK365/MsiFNJl3OaSFjdUTb95EqoDS935 o8+Ad2Qmof354qOwUNn7iyNsYhugYR5RKJ4R6b3k7CpaFrVAtJThnL0BEwnMkPw+ L/EO/GneA+9MAflc8ciq =BJSu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----->From d7a2bb97de6be5f125cbbd7d72ada75e95fa53be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonas Genannt <jo...@brachium-system.net> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:52:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] added Ruby pkg team checks --- checks/ruby.desc | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ checks/ruby.pm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ profiles/debian/main.profile | 2 +- 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 checks/ruby.desc create mode 100644 checks/ruby.pm diff --git a/checks/ruby.desc b/checks/ruby.desc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f635090 --- /dev/null +++ b/checks/ruby.desc @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +Check-Script: ruby +Author: Jonas Genannt <jonas.gena...@capi2name.de> +Type: binary +Info: Checks various Ruby PKG Team stuff +Needs-Info: bin-pkg-control, index, scripts, unpacked + +Tag: ruby-depends-on-ruby1.8 +Severity: serious +Certainty: certain +Info: This package depends on ruby1.8, but ruby 1.8 is at its end of life. + Please check your package against newer Ruby versions and update your + dependencies to "ruby | ruby-interpreter", or in the worst case, to a newer + Ruby version. + . + https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging + +Tag: ruby-depends-on-specific-ruby-version +Severity: normal +Certainty: certain +Info: This package depends on a specific ruby version. + Packages should not depend on a specific ruby version if possible, because + this makes it harder to drop support for obsolete Ruby versions. Ideally + packages should declare a dependency on Ruby using a generic + "ruby | ruby-interpreter". + . + https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging + +Tag: ruby-library-old-package-name-schema +Severity: serious +Certainty: certain +Info: Your ruby library package name does not fit the Debian standards for Ruby. + The package name does not fit the current naming scheme for Ruby packages. + Ruby libraries should named like `ruby-foo`. Packages named libfoo-ruby* are + deprecated. + . + https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging diff --git a/checks/ruby.pm b/checks/ruby.pm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..89f1987 --- /dev/null +++ b/checks/ruby.pm @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +package Lintian::ruby; + +use strict; +use warnings; + +use Lintian::Collect::Binary (); +use Lintian::Tags qw(tag); + +sub run { + my $pkg = shift; + my $type = shift; + my $info = shift; + + if ($type eq 'binary') { + + my $pkg_description = $info->field('description'); + if ($pkg_description) { + if ($pkg =~ /^lib.*-ruby.*/ and !$info->is_pkg_class('transitional') ) { + tag 'ruby-library-old-package-name-schema'; + } + } + + my $str_deps = $info->relation('strong'); + if ($str_deps and $str_deps->implies("ruby1.8")) { + tag 'ruby-depends-on-ruby1.8'; + } + + if ($str_deps and $str_deps->matches(qr/^ruby[0-9.]+$/o) and !$str_deps->implies("ruby1.8")) { + tag 'ruby-depends-on-specific-ruby-version'; + } + } +} + +1; +# Local Variables: +# indent-tabs-mode: nil +# cperl-indent-level: 4 +# End: +# vim: syntax=perl sw=4 sts=4 sr et diff --git a/profiles/debian/main.profile b/profiles/debian/main.profile index 336d1f0..2772c6a 100644 --- a/profiles/debian/main.profile +++ b/profiles/debian/main.profile @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ Enable-Tags-From-Check: apache2, automake, binaries, changelog-file, changes-fil infofiles, init.d, java, lintian, manpages, md5sums, menu-format, menus, nmu, ocaml, patch-systems, phppear, po-debconf, rules, scripts, shared-libs, source-copyright, standards-version, symlinks, systemd, testsuite, - version-substvars, watch-file + version-substvars, watch-file, ruby Disable-Tags: hardening-no-stackprotector -- 1.7.10.4
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:18:08PM +0000, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 722084 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi, > > > lintian: [checks] Add Ruby pkg team checks to lintian > > Ruby team; any input on this? Would be great if you could either close > this bug or clone it to reflect the individual checks required. :) In the way that we currently handle Ruby in Debian, I don't think these checksa are useful anymore. Closing.signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---