On 08/02/18 at 22:43 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 858588 + pending
> thanks
>
> Okay, after confusing myself even more for a bit, this is now
> pending upload:
>
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=0848266e444d029c6fa826f1a6d3e8dd2dad0739
Thanks!
- Lucas
tags 858588 + pending
thanks
Okay, after confusing myself even more for a bit, this is now
pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=0848266e444d029c6fa826f1a6d3e8dd2dad0739
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
On 08/02/18 at 20:05 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > I could even argue that the above tag is misnamed, and should be e.g.
> > systemd-no-service-file-for-init-script-but-other-init-scripts-have-
> > service-file
>
> Oh wow. Indeed, this is actually quite badly misnamed which
Hi Lucas,
> I could even argue that the above tag is misnamed, and should be e.g.
> systemd-no-service-file-for-init-script-but-other-init-scripts-have-
> service-file
Oh wow. Indeed, this is actually quite badly misnamed which probably
led to much of my confusion here. :)
How about we simply
On 03/02/18 at 04:00 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 858588 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > It would be great to add a classification tag in the case where
> > no service file is provided for an init script, even if the maintainer
> > did not make any other effort to make the package
tags 858588 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Lucas,
> It would be great to add a classification tag in the case where
> no service file is provided for an init script, even if the maintainer
> did not make any other effort to make the package work with systemd.
^^
I can't
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.50.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
In <2af5949a-7683-b668-0a96-e4f85f4fa...@dogguy.org>, Mehdi mentioned
"All packages with daemons provide a unit file for SystemD" as a
possible idea for the roadmap.
it seems that lintian is not able to track this yet, because
7 matches
Mail list logo
